Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 28, 1988 <br />�PROVAL OF MINUTES <br />Councilmember Goetten requested a slight amendment to <br />her comments regarding the legislative activity of the <br />Hennepin County Park Board (Additional Information - <br />page 9). <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />It was moved by Councilmember Goetten, seconded by <br />Councilmember Peterson, to approve the Minutes of the <br />March 14, 1988 Council meeting as amended. Motion, Ayes <br />4, Nays 0. <br />There were no comments from the public. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS <br />Planning Commissioner Ed Brown was present. <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: <br />11223 JOHN B. WALDRON <br />1951 CONCORDIA STREET <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE <br />John Waldron was present for this matter. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson reviewed the original <br />proposal which was denied by Planning Commission and <br />• Council. The revised proposal consists of a 3' deep cut <br />extending to the foundation wall of the existing <br />residence requiring a variance and conditional use <br />permit to allow this work within the 0 -75' lakeshore <br />setback zone. In addition, variances are requested to <br />allow a deck structure resulting in 1.41% increase in <br />hardcover in the 0 -75' lakeshore setback zone. Planning <br />Commission recommended denial of the of the 3' cut; <br />and approval of variances to allow deck within the 0- <br />75' lakeshore and average lakeshore setback zone subject <br />to no additional hardcover in the 0 -75' zone (requiring <br />removal of an equal amount of existing 0 -75' hardcover). <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron explained nine <br />alternatives to restoring the lakeshore bank. <br />Based on the relative values and aesthetic impacts of <br />the nine alteratives, staff recommends Option E, which <br />consists of a partial retaining wall system, for <br />restoring the lakeshore bank. <br />Mr. Waldron felt that based on visual impact his <br />proposed 3' cut would be less obtrusive than a retaining <br />wall. He stated that the 3' cut was a compromise from <br />the original plan. <br />Q <br />