My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-08-1988 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
02-08-1988 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2012 4:30:28 PM
Creation date
8/21/2012 4:30:28 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
m <br />0 1 <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 8, 1988 <br />#1223 WALDRON CONTINUED <br />Council indicated to Mr. Waldron that they needed more <br />information to make a decision based on City policy and <br />City Administrator Bernhardson delineated the 5 <br />alternatives that should be analyzed for the Planning <br />Commission and Council. <br />It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember" <br />Sime, to table this application pending review and <br />recommendation from the Planning Commission. Motion, <br />Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />#1232 BETZ. BUILDERS /CLEMENT C. KROLL <br />60 /160 STUBBS BAY ROAD <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION <br />RESOLUTION #2364 <br />Thomas Betz and Clement Kroll were present for this <br />matter. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained the proposed 5- <br />lot division of 2 parcels. All five lots will be served <br />by a private road. <br />• Zoning Administrator Mabusth noted that on -site testing <br />has confirmed that four lots have adequate area for on- <br />site sewage treatment systems (septic testing is not <br />required forgone lot because it exceeds 5+ acres in <br />area). Staff has recommended an outlot extension be <br />provided to serve the property to the east when it is <br />developed. <br />Councilmember Goetten recommended that the fact that the <br />tennis court is a non - conforming structure that does not <br />meet the required setbacks be noted in the resolution. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated it ,would be <br />incorporated in the final subdivision resolution. <br />Mr. Kroll noted that his name appeared incorrectly in <br />the drafted resolution. He also questioned the status <br />of the existing tennis court. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained that the tennis <br />court is a non- conforming structure which requires <br />variance approval to allow any improvements to the <br />structure. She noted that this would have been the case <br />even without this subdivsion action. <br />Councilmember Callahan asked staff about the best <br />• alignment for the outlot extension. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.