My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-10-1987 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1987
>
08-10-1987 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2012 4:08:58 PM
Creation date
8/21/2012 4:08:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1INUTES OF THE REGULAR•ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 10, 1987 <br />41176 PUTNAM CONTINUED <br />Richard Putnam was present for this matter. He reviewed <br />drawings of his proposal to construct an addition to <br />connect the existing house to the enlarged garage, and a <br />porch addition. He explained the reasons for placement <br />of garage and porch due to the effort to save mature <br />tree(s). He noted the letter presented to Council this <br />evening from neighbor Kenneth Erickson stating no <br />objection to the plan. <br />Planning Commission Chairman Kelley noted that Planning <br />Commission discussed the lack of hardship involved and <br />also the fact that the house may be for sale. <br />Mr. Putnam stated that the house is not currently for <br />sale, but if his request is not approved he would sell <br />the house because the existing house currently does not <br />meet his needs. _ <br />Planning Commission Chairman Kelley noted that Planning <br />Commission felt the project as a whole was ambitious. <br />Councilmember Sime felt that the proposed screen porch <br />would obstruct the sightline even given the most <br />generous average lakeshore setback line, and also felt <br />the proposal was too ambitious. <br />Councilmember Goetten felt the plan should be scaled <br />down in order for her to approve. She felt a 3 car <br />garage was not appropriate for this area. <br />Councilmember Callahan felt that the attaching addition <br />seemed appropriate in conjuction with necessary repair <br />of the existing garage. He did not feel the porch would <br />affect views and would enhance the lakefront. <br />Councilmember Goetten reiterated her feeling that a 3 <br />car garage was not appropriate for this area. She felt <br />an average lakeshore variance for an open deck area <br />would be appropriate but not for the proposed enclosed <br />screen porch. <br />Councilmember Sime concurred with Councilmember Goetten. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by <br />Councilmember Peterson, to approve the variances and <br />proposal as submitted. Motion, Ayes 4, Nays 1. <br />Councilmember Goetten voted nay. <br />G-' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.