Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD AUGUST 10, 1987 <br />#1165 FAY CONTINUED <br />Councilmember Goetten asked applicant to state his <br />reasons for the proposed placement of detached garage. <br />Steve Fay listed the following reasons for the proposed <br />placement of detached garage: <br />1. He does not want to eliminate the existing long <br />sidewalk around the house. <br />2. The primary reason for placement is in order to <br />utilize the existing driveway. <br />3. He also would like to utilize the unused side <br />property. <br />He noted that there have been no objections from the <br />neighbors. <br />Mayor Grabek questioned the hardship involved. <br />Councilmember Goetten felt it important to have inside <br />storage and noted that applicant currently has only a <br />single car garage. <br />Councilmember Callahan noted that in the past there has <br />been a tendency for owners to ultimately want to attach <br />their detached garages. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by <br />Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2240 <br />approving the variance for a detached garage subject to <br />no future attachment of garage to residence. Motion, <br />Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />11166 HARTMUT GINNOW- MERKRRT <br />1840 LAKEVIEW TERRACE <br />VARIANCE <br />RESOLUTION #2241 <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained the request for <br />a front yard setback variance to construct a second <br />story deck on the southwest side of the residence. The <br />reasons for the proposed placement is due to the well <br />location on the west, septic pipes located on east, and <br />noise from County Road 6 on north. An alternative to <br />reduce deck structure in front yard would be to possibly <br />wrap deck around the side. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth stated that the proposed <br />deck is only 10' x 20' and that the existing landscaping <br />may not allow a wrap - around deck. <br />Hartmut Ginnow - Merkert was present for this matter and <br />stated he found no advantage to a wrap - around deck. <br />It was moved by Councilmember Callahan, seconded by <br />Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2241 <br />approving the front yard setback variance for a second <br />story deck subject to any enclosure of the deck <br />requiring additional variance review. Motion, Ayes 5, <br />Nays 0. 3 <br />