My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-27-1987 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1987
>
04-27-1987 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2012 3:46:36 PM
Creation date
8/21/2012 3:46:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD APRIL 27, 1987 <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLAN #2 <br />CONTINUED <br />Mayor Grabek felt <br />fully discussed <br />Councils. <br />that the issue should be more <br />between Long Lake and Orono <br />It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Councilmember <br />Goetten, to table the Highway 12 Comprehensive Plan #2 <br />until the May 11, 1987 Council meeting directing staff <br />to schedule a meeting with the Long Lake City Council. <br />Motion, Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />#1110 ROBERT MARTINSON <br />1840 SHORELINE DRIVE <br />VARIANCE <br />RESOLUTION #2164 <br />Robert Martinson was present for this matter. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained that this <br />matter was previously tabled so applicant could attend. <br />The request consisted of developing a previously <br />subdivided lot which requires a 10% area variance, 36- <br />1/2% width variance. The proposed house is located 250' <br />from the shoreline however the proposed grade -level deck <br />and pool are located within the average lakeshore <br />setback. Because this is a through lot variances are <br />required for the three accessory structures (deck, pool, <br />and paddle tennis court). Also required is a variance <br />for the dock accessory structures because the primary <br />structure is across Shoreline Drive. There are no <br />hardcover variances requested. <br />City Attorney Blatz gave her legal opinion on setting a <br />time limit condition on the use of the paddle tennis <br />court advising against it because previous similar <br />requests have been granted without the time limit <br />condition. She recommend setting a standard to be used <br />as a general standard on all such conditional use permit <br />requests. <br />Mayor Grabek asked if Mr. Martinson would be agreeable <br />to a standard condition of no paddle tennis play after <br />10:30/11:00 P.M. <br />Mr. Martinson stated he has already agreed to this <br />condition. <br />Councilmember Callahan questioned the history of the <br />property next to the applicants regarding denying a <br />request to build or subdivide. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth explained the difference <br />involved in the application Councilmember Callahan <br />ref erred to. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.