My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-30-1987 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
1980-1989
>
1987
>
03-30-1987 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2012 3:45:31 PM
Creation date
8/21/2012 3:45:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD MARCH 30, 1987 <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: <br />11096 J. VOGT /M. HILBELINK* <br />95/175 WATERTOWN ROAD <br />FINAL SUBDIVISION <br />RESOLUTION 12152 <br />It was moved by Councilmember Sime, seconded by <br />Councilmember Goetten, to adopt Resolution #2152 <br />approving the Plat of Peterman Second Addition. Motion, <br />Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLAN #2 <br />Mayor Smeby of Long Lake was present for this matter. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson recommended that formal <br />action on the Comprehensive Plan #2 be tabled until the <br />April 27, 1987 meeting as requested by Mr. Rebers, owner <br />of Area 4. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained that the <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment being proposed is the <br />result of a year long study of the Highway 12 Corridor. <br />Once the Council has given preliminary approval, the <br />plan is sent to the Metropolitan Council for approval <br />and also sent to the affected jurisdictions for their <br />comments. After Metro Council approval, it would be <br />brought back to the City Council for final adoption and <br />implementation. <br />City Administrator Bernhardson explained the overall <br />comprehensive plan objectives were as follows: <br />1. Land use - using Orono's general philosophy of <br />protecting Lake Minnetonka (runoff etc.). <br />2. Transportation - dealing with Highway 12, <br />transportation problems through and across corridor. <br />3. Environmental Protection - keeping major <br />environmental features intact and if, possible <br />enhancing them. <br />4. Public Service Provision - that any improvements <br />be able to pay for themselves, noting it is not the <br />intent of this change to generate any tax base. <br />General alternatives considered in this study as <br />follows: <br />1. Leave as status quo. <br />2. Develop possible on -site septic uses that were <br />not not typical single family home uses. <br />3. Possible development beyond the existing systems <br />capacity, particularly transportation, sewer & water <br />in the area. <br />4. Not to go beyond the existing systems, remain <br />within the existing capacity. <br />5. Combination of all alternatives 1 -4. <br />He reviewed the implementation process and performance <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.