Laserfiche WebLink
JUL-21-2003 16�10 MINNEHAHA CREEK WRTERSHED 6124710682 P.03i12 <br /> � WET.LAND CON5ERVATIOIV ACT <br /> TECHNICAL E�ALUATION PANEL <br /> - FINDIN�S OF FACT <br /> Date: T�ebruar 11 2003 LGU:Minnchaha Crcek Watershed District <br /> County: T�enne in LGU Cantact:Micha Wvatt <br /> .ulluln Phone#: 952-471-QS90 <br /> Location of Projec[: N NE 36 118N R23W � <br /> 'h 44 �/e Sectioa Towaahip R�age LoU8lock <br /> nr�no Henn�pin <br /> City County � <br /> TEP Members(and othcrs)who reviewed project: <br /> (Check if viewcd projcct sitc) <br /> (7� SWCD: Ellen Soncs (�BWSR: Lvnda Peterson <br /> ( )T;Cr�[I; ( )CO�: � <br /> Other'Wetland Experts present: Mike Deruvter.Kiolhau�Environmencal Scrvices <br /> T�1'requested by: Mike Deruvr.er,Ki�lhaur Environmental Services <br /> I. Type of T�P detcrmination rcquested(r.Ndck�hc�sr.lhul apply�: <br /> Delineation chcek <br /> Exemption Determination(WCA L�xemplion# ) <br /> X No-Loss Determination <br /> X Replacement Plan <br /> 2. Descriplion uf Welland wiLh prc�posed impact: <br /> e.Wc�and Typc(Circular�9) 4/5 (Cowardin) PEMG/YUBG <br /> b,Siu oCProposed Impac[(tenths of acre) <br /> 3. I�Iave sz��uencing rcc�uircmcnts becn addressed?,�yes X no <br /> 4. Is the project consisf.ei�t.witl�tha inteuc of the cumptehensive lucal wat�r pIan and/qr d�e wazershed districf plan, <br /> lhc mctropolitan surface water mana�;ement�llan atld me[ropoli[�n gruundwatcr m:inagement plan,and local ' <br /> comprehcnsivc plan and zoniag ordinance? Yes( ) No( ) <br /> 5, Thc projecc will affect the following wetland fi►nctions: <br /> Nunctions Imnact No Impact lmprove <br /> l�loodwatcr Stqragc X <br /> Nulrient Assimilation <br /> Sediment EnLrapmen� X <br /> GroundwAter RechArge � <br /> Low F(ow t�ugmentacioo X <br /> Aes[hetics/Recrcation X <br /> Shoreland Anchoring <br /> Wildlife Habitat X <br /> Fisheries HabitAt <br /> Rare FlandAnimal I�Iabitat. <br /> Commercial Uses <br /> ., 6. For�eplacement plan or no-Ioss deternunations,are wecland funedons mainCained at an equal or greater level? <br /> Yes( ) No(X) <br /> 7. Docs Technical Evaluation Aanel recommend Approval of ihe aetivil'y prop�scd in item l.? <br /> Yes( ) No(� <br /> If no,why? See attach�nent <br /> 8.SIGNATU'12�5 t►'f I�:P decision rs no[a coresc�Rsu.r,note.H�ith terisk ar�d ex�lain on t{�back of this page) <br /> a q 3 /�-- �q �3 <br /> SWCD Itepresentaave (Da�e) B R cpresenlativc (U�) Lf�U Represcnt�rivc (Date) <br /> TSP Findin�of Pact(2Q00) <br />