My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-19-2012 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2012
>
03-19-2012 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2012 4:39:44 PM
Creation date
8/20/2012 4:39:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
208
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• •t � <br /> MIlVUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Tuesday,February 21,2012 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> The trees along the roadway should not be impacted by the construction. The driveway that is in the rear <br /> of the property will need to remain because it allows access by the neighbor to his property. Since this <br /> property owner will not be using that piece of driveway anymore,it can be narrowed down. <br /> Sonneck noted the wetland was created when Ferndale and Count�y'Road�l`S�was constructed to <br /> accommodate the runoff frorri the road. It is called a Preserve wetland now,hut it is actually to <br /> accommodate road runoff,which is why Svoboda classif ed,it tlie way fhey did. <br /> The property owners need a garage of a suitable size due to'the li�ed d '�eway�and the fact that <br /> Ferndale Road is not wide enou h to accommodate arkin . � <br /> g P� g'� �'"� <br /> Levang asked how the driveway for the neighbor would�ork ,: -- , <br /> Curtis displayed the survey on the overhead. _ <br /> Sonnek illustrated on the overhead the location o�f� e��drivaw.�ay and how�e neigYt�bor would access his � <br /> property. Sonnek noted they ar.e,proposing a se�arate drivaway for this prop,e�rG,y'� <br /> Levan asked if there is any concern about�re bei� n�g�kwo,curb c�-_West Ferndale. <br /> g � . <br /> Sonnek indicated there currentl are two curb cu�s. ;' � <br /> Y ���,:� �,. <br /> Curtis stated the applicant is proposing to-ehminatethe�r tise of the second curb cut and narrow their <br /> driveway. Curtis noted the app 'cants will be removing the portio of the shared driveway that leads to <br /> their garage. �' �� � <br /> Levang noted the,.neighboring house,has a''second story deck, and asked what their view will be from the <br /> deck. <br /> .: 'm,',. � '� <br /> Sonnek illustrated the�vaew of tlie eighbors o theroverhead. That property will be able to see the entire <br /> bay,rea since they are p oposing to�`locate the new house further back. <br /> � , � � � <br /> evang asked what the stone s�eture�ould be used for. <br /> �: � � <br /> Sonne indicate it is just basically a shed at the present time and that they will be replacing the roof on <br /> it. <br /> Landgraver asked`if the li le pathway to the structure is included in the hardcover calculations. <br /> Sonnek indicated i�d that they have attempted to minimize the hardcover in the 0-75 foot zone as <br /> much as possible as well sin the other zones. Sonnek stated they might be able to trim a little more off <br /> the driveway. <br /> Levang asked what will happen with the wooden fencing. <br /> Sonnek indicated all of the wooden fencing will be removed and new vegetation will be planted in place <br /> of some of the fence. <br /> Page 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.