My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-19-2012 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2012
>
03-19-2012 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2012 4:39:44 PM
Creation date
8/20/2012 4:39:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
208
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� ` PC Exhibit N � <br /> MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMI��IISSION MEETING <br /> Tuesday,February 21,2012 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Leskinen moved,Schoenzeit seconded,to recommend approval of Application#12-3538,Roberts <br /> Residential Remodeling on Behalf of Colin and Anna Peters,3520 North Shore Drive,granting of a <br /> 0-75 foot zone hardcover variance and a 75-250 foot zone hardcover variance,subject to Conditions ' <br /> 1 through 9 outlined in Staff's report. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays.0. <br /> . <br /> NEW BUSINESS ��,�°�-� <br /> 4. #12-3544 CHARLES CUDD DeNOVO ON BEHALF OF 11,�I�.�Y J.BQ�`'VMAN TRUST, <br /> 1165 FERNDALE ROAD WEST,VARIANCES AND.CONDITION {iJSE PERMIT,6:53 P.M.— <br /> 7:23 P.M. <br /> Anna and Colin Peters,Applicants,were present along rth John Sonnelc, Charles Cud�representative. <br /> �����" � er to <br /> Curtis stated the applicant, on behalf of the owners, is requestmg the�ollowmg�approvals in ord <br /> construct a new residence on the property and mamCain h��existing stone structure: <br /> � V � � <br /> 1. A lakeshore setback variance to allo a 47=foot etback from the lake for the proposed home <br /> where a 75-foot setback is required� :' <br /> �� :, '�,; <br /> - 2. Hardcover variances within the�0-75 foo zone to�allow 0 pe�eent hardcover where 0 percent is <br /> ' allowed and within the 75 2�50 foot ne to aliow 28 pexcerit hardcover where 25 percent is <br /> allowed; �'�� ��� � � <br /> 3. An average lakeshore setback yariance to permit portions of the proposed home to encroach <br /> closer to the lake than��he.adjacent residential home; <br /> �,;=�,.,�°� <br /> 4. A ,e�land b ff r'setback vanan�e for aportion of the proposed home; <br /> . . .,' ,i �, �" ''°�,. <br /> 5. A rear/str�setback variance to allov�an existing, stone building to remain 0 feet from the <br /> { p�perty line and al�owthe new home to�be constructed 33 feet from the property line where a 50- <br /> } <br /> ` foot setback is norma`ll}�reqai'red;and <br /> 6. °f A o.nditional use permit to conduct grading activity within the 75-foot setback and within the <br /> . . .� . �' . . <br /> floodplain in con�uncnon witharemoval of the existtng home and construction of the new home. <br /> The existing�home�Was consf.i-ucted�ir►�pproximately 1940. It is a one-story home with a partial2nd � <br /> story. A small�fieldstone structu e also exists on the property. This stone structure once served as the <br /> well house for Woodhill Cou�,try Club. The applicant is requesting variance approvals in order to <br /> construct a new 2-stor��ho�me on the property as well as continue to maintain the stone structure. <br /> The applicant is proposing to remove the circle configuration of the driveway,which is shared with the <br /> neighbor to the west,and is proposing one access off of Ferndale Road. The existing home encroaches 20 <br /> feet into the side setback and 28 feet into the 75-foot lake setback. The structural coverage being <br /> proposed is 13 percent,which is below the maximum 15 percent level. If the entire property is included <br /> in the calculation,the structural coverage would be closer to 2.6 percent. <br /> Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.