Laserfiche WebLink
� FI LE#12-3548 <br /> 74 March 2012 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> initially have a minimally leveled, crushed granite flooring and wooden or steel support posts for <br /> the structure. <br /> Setbacks Required Proposed <br /> ' 20' pavilion <br /> Preserve Wetland Buffer& Buffer Setback ��' ±5'observation platforms <br /> Lakeshore Setback(974.5')* 150' �80'-100'±pavilion <br /> �0'-10' observation platforms <br /> *As indicated previously, the applicant's survey does not reflect the 974.5' elevation contour. <br /> The proposed lake setback measurements listed in the table above are staff estimates based on <br /> the information provided. Staff recommends the Planning Commission use the staff estimates <br /> for discussion and recommendation purposes. <br /> Conditional Use Permit <br /> City Code Section 78-916 provides guidance for reviewing a CUP. The City may grant a CUP if <br /> the City finds that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be: <br /> (1) Consistent with the community management plan; in the opinion of staff this <br /> �criterion is met. <br /> (2) Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific <br /> � uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; in the opinion of staff this criterion is <br /> met. <br /> (3) Adequately served by police,fire, roads, and stormwater management; in the <br /> opinion of staff this criterion is met. • <br /> (4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; NA <br /> (5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; if <br /> does not appear the project will generate excessive demand for public services. In the opinion of <br /> staff this criterion is met. <br /> (6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as <br /> it is planned to be used in the future; the proposed use is an extension of school services and <br /> programs and appears to be consistent with the use of the property as it is currently used and <br /> intended to be used in the future. In the opinion of staff this criterion is met. <br /> (7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of <br /> character is called for in the community management plan; the proposed use is an extension of <br /> school services and programs and in keeping with the character of the property as it is currently <br /> used and intended to be used in the future in the CMP. In the opinion of staff this criterion is <br /> met. ' � <br /> � (8) Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the <br /> surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan: <br /> the proposal is in keeping with the proposed environmentally sensitive location. In the opinion of <br />