My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/19/2012 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
03/19/2012 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2012 3:22:55 PM
Creation date
8/20/2012 3:22:54 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,March 19,2012 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> 4. A wetland buffer setback variance to allow the new attached garage to encroach 15 plus feet into <br /> the 20-foot buffer setback. <br /> 5. A wetland buffer impact mitigation for 1,059 square feet of buffer impact and 1,210 square feet <br /> of mitigation proposed in the Ferndale Road ditch. <br /> 6. A rear/street setback variance to allow an existing, stone building to remain 0'from the property <br /> line and allow the new home to be constructed 33'from the property line where a 50-foot setback <br /> is normally required. <br /> 7. A conditional use permit to conduct grading activity within the 75-foot setback and within the <br /> floodplain in conjunction with removal of the existing home and construction of the new home. <br /> The structural coverage numbers have been revised and are based on the home site portion of the parcel <br /> on the south side of Ferndale Road. The calculation was presented this way in order to adequately <br /> address the relationship of the massing of the proposed home when compared to neighboring properties. <br /> The result is a proposed lot coverage level of 14 percent,which is below the allowed 15 percent level. If <br /> the entire property is included,the structural coverage level would be closer to 2.8 percent. <br /> The proposed hardcover has been adjusted to account for the applicant's proposed removal of the existing <br /> access on to the shared driveway. The hardcover numbers contained in Staffs report have been revised <br /> based on the corrected hardcover information and revised survey. The driveway serving only the <br /> neighbor's property has been recalculated to 1,194 square feet. Hardcover in the 0-75'zone is currently <br /> 16.4 percent. The applicant is proposing 9.7 percent hardcover in this zone. Within the 75-250'zone the <br /> applicant is proposing 33.8 percent,which is 769 square feet less hardcover than existing. <br /> There are two Preserve classification wetlands present on the home site portion of the property. The <br /> portions of the property across Ferndale Road are impacted by the larger Ferndale Marsh,which is also a <br /> Preserve wetland. A 50-foot buffer and 20-foot structural setback from the buffer are required from each <br /> of the Preserve wetlands. The survey has been revised to correctly represent Wetland 1 as a Preserve <br /> wetland. Therefore,the relative buffer width has also been revised. As a result, a portion of the proposed <br /> garage will encroach into the required buffer setback from the western wetland. It appears the garage <br /> encroaches approximately 15 feet into the required buffer setback. <br /> Additionally, existing and proposed structures and hardcover which encroach into the required buffer will <br /> require mitigation of buffer area square footage as impacted. The applicant has calculated the impacted <br /> buffer area and provided a buffer mitigation plan. However,the proposed mitigation is entirely within the <br /> ditch or right-of-way of Ferndale Road West. While it is an acceptable location for a buffer to filter road <br /> runoff,the mitigation area should be located on the applicant's property. <br /> John Sonnek noted they have submitted a revised plan and the mitigation area is now located on the <br /> property. <br /> Curtis stated Staff did receive a revised landscape plan today and that she has not had time to review it in <br /> detail. Staff recommends approval of the application as outlined in Staff's report. <br /> Landgraver asked why Item No. 1 is included under issues for consideration. <br /> Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.