Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> l <br /> FILE#11-3527 <br /> 10 October 2011 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> List of Exhibits <br /> ExhibitA. Application <br /> Exhibit 8. Practical Difficulty Documentation Form <br /> Exhibit C. Proposed Survey <br /> Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations <br /> Exhibit E. Resolution No. 5511—Expired � <br /> Exhibit F. Buildable Envelope Illustration <br /> Exhibit G. Signatures from the Trees To Be Homeowner's Association <br /> Exhibit H. Aerial Photos <br /> Exhibit l. Property Owners List <br /> ExhibitJ. Plat Map <br /> Background <br /> The applicants are proposing to construct a two-car garage addition on the east side of the <br /> property. A screen porch is also proposed; however the porch is proposed to meet the required <br /> setback and is not part of this variance request.The east side lot line abuts a private road outlot, <br /> owned by the homeowners association, with underlying road easements to the City for possible <br /> future connection to Gander Road. The private road outlot has not yet been developed with a <br /> road; it is wooded land and visually appears merely as part of the applicants property. However, <br /> this con�guration makes the east lot line a "side street lot line" with a required "side street <br /> yard" of 50' in which structures are normally not allowed. <br /> Applicants are requesting a variance to allow the construction of a garage addition to be located <br /> 28' from the east lot line rather than the required 50'. Applicants' position, and apparently that <br /> of the neighborhood, is that the outlot is unlikely to ever be developed for road purposes, and <br /> therefore structures that would be encroachments if it was to be a road, will have no negative <br /> impacts until/unless it becomes a road, if ever. <br /> A similar request by the previous owners was made in 2006. The owners at that time were <br /> requesting a setback variance to allow a 40-foot setback where a 50-foot setback is required in <br /> order to construct a garage addition.Staff and the Planning Commission recommended denial of <br /> the request, however the City Council voted to approve the requested setback variance. The <br /> owners did not construct the addition and the variance has since expired. <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET <br /> Lot Area/Width: <br /> RR-16 Lot Area Lot Width <br /> Required 87,120 s.f. (2 acres) 200' <br /> Actual 95,724 s.f. (2.2 acre) 220' <br /> Setbacks: <br /> RR-16 Required Existing Proposed <br /> Front 50' 150'+ No change <br /> Rear 50' 150'+ No change <br /> West Side 30' S8.7'to the existing No change <br /> home <br /> East Side (Street) 50' 64'to the existing home 28' proposed addition <br />