My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-19-2011 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2011
>
09-19-2011 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2012 4:34:27 PM
Creation date
8/15/2012 4:34:16 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
198
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. � � <br /> . � <br /> FILE#11-3524 <br /> 14 September 2011 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> The adjacent property contains a large, Preserve classification wetland which extends onto the <br /> applicants' property. Preserve wetlands are determined to be the highest quality wetlands.They <br /> also warrant the highest level of protection which equates to the largest buffer; a 50-foot buffer <br /> plus a 20-foot structural setback from the buffer is required. <br /> Earlier this summer, the applicants applied for a permit to construct a small dining room <br /> addition to the north side of the home. This addition did not trigger the buffer requirements of <br /> the wetland ordinance [78-1601(c)]. The staff estimation of the edge of the buffer placed the <br /> proposed dining room addition outside of the required 70-foot total setback from the wetland. <br /> To avoid undue financial burden to the applicants, staff uses the best information available to <br /> make these determinations without requiring a wetland delineation. If the project had triggered <br /> the buffer requirement of the wetland ordinance a wetland delineation would have been <br /> required as a matter of course. <br /> Because the applicants are now requesting a permit to consfruct the garage addition, which is <br /> located much closer to the wetland, a wetland delineation was necessary and required. The <br /> project (plus the dining room project) does not move enough soil to trigger the requirement to <br /> implement the 50-wide vegetative buffer therefore a buffer plan is not required. Section 78- <br /> 1608(3)(c) prohibits the creation of new non-conformities; the garage must be constructed to <br /> meet the required 70-foot total setback. As indicated by the attached survey, the 70-foot <br /> setback extends into the middle of the existing home. It should be noted that the new dining <br /> room addition partially encroaches into this setback as well. The applicants are requesting a <br /> variance from the required 70-foot setback in order to construct the garage addition. They have <br /> proposed the creation of a native planting area and rain garden in order to mitigate the <br /> potential negative impacts from the proposed encroachment. <br /> • ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET <br /> Lot Area/Width: <br /> R-1A Lot Area Lot Width <br /> Required 43,560 s.f. (1.0 acre) 140' <br /> Actual 28,600 s.f. (0.66 acre) 80' <br /> R-1A Setbacks: <br /> R-1A Required Existing Proposed <br /> Front 35' 82' 80' <br /> Rear 30' S8' 52' <br /> North Side 10' 53.5' No change <br /> South Side 10' 23.5' 10' <br /> Wetland Setbacks: <br /> Preserve Classification Required Existing Proposed <br /> House 70' (50'+20') 28' 16' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.