Laserfiche WebLink
� MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,August 15,2011 <br /> ' 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> road. Puzak stated if they can get on the right track now and head for a long-term solution,that should be <br /> what is considered. <br /> Schoenzeit indicated that would be outside the scope of what the Planning Commission is considering <br /> tonight,but that if he understands Mr.Puzak's comments tonight,he would like to see the pavement <br /> remain. <br /> Puzak requested the original Gronberg survey be displayed. There are a number of discrepancies in the <br /> survey and it does not show the full extent of the easement. It references a secondary easement,which is <br /> incorrect. The secondary easement is valid only over Lots 21 and 22. Puzak stated the Planning <br /> Commission is talking about blacktop to be removed inside a landscaped area,which would make the <br /> hardcover calculation incorrect. <br /> Curtis pointed out the azea of the landscaping. Curtis stated the arrow is pointing to the extent of the <br /> removal,which is on the edge of the proposed new driveway. <br /> Puzak indicated that is not correct. The Wingerds are also showing removal of blacktop into his <br /> driveway. Puzak stated he is not sure how the Planning Commission can vote on this without a correct <br /> survey. � <br /> Schoenzeit noted the Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council and that the applicant <br /> must submit a complete and correct survey prior to moving to the City Council. <br /> Puzak commented he would hope they would do so. Puzak asked whether everyone is supposed to <br /> receive a mailer regarding this application. <br /> Curtis stated a postcard is mailed out to the adjoining property owners. <br /> Schoenzeit stated the City receives a list from Hennepin County based on tax records. The City then <br /> takes that list and mails the notice to the appropriate property owners. <br /> � Puzak stated he is the landowner of record and he did not receive notice of tonight's hearing. <br /> Curtis indicated the notice would have been sent to 440 West Arm Road East, Spring Park,Minnesota, <br /> under the nazne of 1350 Baldur,LLC. <br /> Puzak stated according to the list he should have been mailed four of them. <br /> Curtis indicated the City would have only mailed one since the duplicates are removed. <br /> Puzak stated he would like to see an affidavit of mailing since he did not receive any. <br /> Curtis noted they do have an affidavit of mailing. <br /> Puzak stated he would like to receive future notices. <br /> Schoenzeit stated Sta.ff strives to ensure accuracy of the notices and Staff can provide that affidavit to Mr. <br /> Puzak. <br /> Page <br /> 19 <br />