Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING . <br /> Monday,August 15,2011 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Mr.Puzak also indicates that we have failed to observe the full width of the easement. In discovery <br /> during litigation,Mr.Puzak only indicates there were two times when he could not get through. Mr. <br /> Puzak only lives there two and a half months out of the year. One of the times when he could not get <br /> through was when he showed up unexpectedly on New Year's Eve. Mr.Wingerd indicated they were out <br /> of the cou.ntry and their children were at the residence. Mr.Wingerd stated in his view it is disingenuous <br /> for him to make that claim. <br /> Mr.Puzak also indicates that they could basically purchase that lot or lots from him. Mr.Puzak has cut <br /> down two enormous cottonwood trees,one was 48 inches across and another one that was 36 inches <br /> across. He has completely defoliated the adjoining lot and it looks like somewhat has poured gas on the <br /> site. The rocks that are along the lake have also been marked. Wingerd indicated he will not let his <br /> two-year old grandson in that area because of feaz of contam.i.nants. <br /> Wingerd indicated he has no obj ection to doing the minor things, such as the sidewalk and the turnaround <br /> jog or whatever Staff recommends. <br /> ,� � <br /> Schoenzeit stated those items would need to be formally recorded in a survey prior to going to City <br /> Council. <br /> Winder indicated that in addition,Mr.Puzak has indicated in his letter that Mr. Crronberg did not put the <br /> easement in the survey,which to his knowledge is depicted on the survey. <br /> Curtis stated to her understanding Mr.Puzak was referencing the blue triangular easement that was <br /> depicted in an earlier survey. Curtis noted she drew that easement on the overhead for illustrative <br /> purposes. <br /> Schoenzeit commented there might be multiple easements. <br /> Winger indicated they are willing to respect his easement and leave him alone. . <br /> Levang asked the applicant to explain where his land is and where the easement is. Levang noted she did <br /> visit the property today and that Mrs.Wingerd had explained that Mr.Puzak has to travel approximately <br /> 60 feet across their driveway to get to his easement and that the Wingerds have never denied him that 60 <br /> feet even though he does not have an official easement over that 60 feet. <br /> Winger indicated she is referring to this area here. <br /> Levang asked Mr.Wingerd to point out the location of the official easement. <br /> Curtis indicated it is the pi.nk and blue lines. <br /> Schoenzeit asked if there are any requirements that that area has to be paved. <br /> Curtis indicated she does not have any details on that easement since it was recorded in 1948. <br /> Wingerd stated the easement has been used by everyone for as long as he can remember. <br /> Schoenzeit asked how the Planning Commission can require the removal of pavement pending litigation. <br /> Page <br /> 15 <br />