My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-18-2011 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2011
>
07-18-2011 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2012 4:04:37 PM
Creation date
8/15/2012 4:04:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE#11-3516 <br /> 13 July 2011 <br /> . . Page 3 of 3 <br /> circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend <br /> approval on/y when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and <br /> intent of the Orono Zoning Code. � <br /> The applicant's variance may be reasonable considering the location of the existing home on the <br /> property. The proposed addition will result in 26 feet of additional massing along the south lot <br /> line. There are a number of trees along the south side of the property which may afford <br /> � adequate screening of the addition from the adjacent property. Staff finds the location of the <br /> ' existing home and the width of the applicant's property creates a unique circumstance not <br /> created by the applicant and that granting the applicant's request is in harmony with the <br /> purpose and intent of the ordinance and will not alter the essential character of the <br /> neighborhood. <br /> In order to construct the addition hardcover removals are necessary. The applicant has <br /> provided a hardcover plan which results in a conforming level of hardcover(25%within the 75'- <br /> 250' zone). However, while the proposed driveway meets the City's minimum standards, the <br /> configuration appears to be difficult for maneuverability. The applicant should address the <br /> proposed driveway configuration to the Planning Commission's satisfaction. <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. A 10 foot setback is the minimum principal structure, side setback permitted in any <br /> zoning district. Should the addition be redesigned and constructed to meet a 10 foot <br /> side setback? <br /> 2. The applicant is proposing a driveway configuration which technically meets the City's <br /> driveway hardcover minimum, however appears to create maneuverability difficulties. <br /> 3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Planning Staff recommends approval of a side setback variance in order to construct the garage <br /> addition and conduct hardcover removals as proposed. Planning Commission should consider <br /> and make a recommendation whether an 8' setback is acceptable or if a 10' setback should be <br /> required. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.