My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-20-2011 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2011
>
06-20-2011 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2012 3:57:42 PM
Creation date
8/15/2012 3:57:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� PC Exhibit G <br /> July 19, 2010 � <br /> Phiilip S. Whipple � <br /> 3095 Casco Point Road <br /> Orono, MN 55391 <br /> City of Orono � <br /> 2750 Kelley Parkway <br /> Post Office Box 66 <br /> . Crysta) Bay, Minnesota 55323 <br /> To: City of Orono, Orono City Council, Orono Planning Commission, Orono Planning <br /> Staff, and Ms. Melanie Curtis, City Planner ' <br /> After eight years living at 3095 Casco Point Road, it is my desire to build a new, more . <br /> energy efficient, structurally sound, and environmentally sensitive home, which would <br /> also eliminate a north side setback encroachment and decrease existing non- <br /> conforming hardcover, so, in essence, be overall more conforming than is the current <br /> residence. 1 have been included in several supportive interactions with Orono's <br /> planning staff regarding the project's specifics and have applied for the required <br /> permission to continue and reduce a hard cover non-conformity that I now possess. <br /> After my application was submitted, I was informed that a recent court decision is <br /> precipitating the change that my application not be supported by staff and very likely <br /> the Planning Commission and City Council as well. I understand that the entire <br /> implication of this court case is not yet fully understood and that it may take an <br /> undetermined amount of time to fully flush out the real impact to this project. I hereby <br /> request a mutually agreed upon pawse, or set aside, of my application for a period of <br /> up to 12 months in lieu of the standard 120 days. In addition, should I decide to . <br /> completely abandon my Orono project within the 12 months, I respectfully request that <br /> my application fees be refunded in full, since I would not have applied for a variance <br /> under the now current condition and without some evidence of support. <br /> I believe this is justifiable as this new development was not caused by me and only the <br /> City of Orono has the authority to decide if modifications to the zoning ordinance may <br /> be necessary, or not, in light of the Minnetonka court case decision. It is certainly my <br /> hope that I will be able to move forward with my project one day. <br /> Thank you for your time and understanding in this matter. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> C . <br /> � <br /> Phillip S. whipp�e RECEIVE� <br /> JUL 19� Z010 <br /> CITY QF ORONO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.