My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-20-2011 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2011
>
06-20-2011 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2012 3:57:42 PM
Creation date
8/15/2012 3:57:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
, 1VIIl�TUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANIVING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,May 16,2011 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Schoenzeit noted the traffic would need to be minimal and that it would need to be discussed as part of <br /> the permitting process. <br /> Curtis noted the traffic is tied to the parking. <br /> It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to allow temporary trellises,cages,poles, supports, etc., <br /> during the growing season. <br /> Curtis requested the Planning Commission provide direction on private gardens. <br /> Thiesse asked whether the Planning Commission could move the community/donation garden forward to <br /> the City Council at this point. , <br /> Schoenzeit stated in his view Staff has good direction on the community/donation garden. Schoenzeit <br /> asked whether there should be a 10-foot setback on a private garden. <br /> Thiesse stated he does not want to go ten feet on a private residential garden. Thiesse asked where a <br /> fence is legally allowed to be.located. <br /> Curtis noted a fence is a non encroachment and is allowed at the property line. <br /> Thiesse commented a lot of gardens define property lines. <br /> � Leskinen pointed out this is in the case where there is not a principal structure. <br /> Curtis stated this would deal with gazdens that are located on vacant lots and that Staff would recommend <br /> some type of setback to serve as a buffer to the adjoining properties. Curtis stated it could perhaps be <br /> better defined in the definition and that a perennial garden could define a property line versus a vegetable <br /> garden. <br /> Schoenzeit stated a private,residential garden on a vacant lot would need to follow the same sort of <br /> discussion on the same points under the community/donation garden. <br /> Leskinen indicated she is comfortable with Staff's recommendations on the private garden. <br /> Curtis suggested the Planning Commission discuss the various items and whether they feel there should <br /> be different regulations for a private,residential garden versus a community/donation garden. <br /> Schoenzeit stated in his view a 10-foot setback is reasonable. <br /> Thiesse indicated he wouldnot be opposed to a row of flowers or shrubs along the property line. <br /> . Curtis stated the definitions can be modified. <br /> Thiesse noted the definition of a garden includes shrubs, which in his opinion should be allowed along the <br /> property line. <br /> Schoenzeit recommended crops require a setback. <br /> ` Page <br /> 17 � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.