My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-20-2011 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2011
>
06-20-2011 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2012 3:57:42 PM
Creation date
8/15/2012 3:57:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
,� <br /> 7 <br /> To: Chair Schoenzeit and Planning Commission Members <br /> Jessica Loftus, City Administrator <br /> From: Melanie Curtis, Planning&Zoning Coordinator h/IG <br /> IV` <br /> Date: 13 June 2011 <br /> Subject: #11-3512—Amend City Code Section 78-43 <br /> Public Hearing <br /> Application Summary: The City is proposing text amendments to City Code Sections 78-100;78- <br /> 121 through 78-123; 78-1111; and 78-1134 regarding hardship analysis for variances from the <br /> Zoning Code requirements. � <br /> Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of the proposed <br /> amendments. . <br /> Pertinent Zoning Ordinance Sections <br /> Sec. 78-100. Subdivisions. <br /> Sec. 78-121. When granted. <br /> Sec. 78-122. References to board. <br /> Sec. 78-123. Issuances. <br /> Sec. 78-1111. Definitions. <br /> Sec. 78-1134.Appeals and variances/duties of the city council. � <br /> List of Exhibits <br /> ExhibitA. DraftOrdinance <br /> Exhibit B. Draft Summary Ordinance <br /> Exhibit C. Existing Code Sections <br /> Exhibit D. M N §462.357 subd 6—revised May 2011 ' <br /> Summary <br /> Currently, Orono City Code requires demonstration of a particular or undue hardship when <br /> making a request for a variance from City zoning code requirements. The statutory language <br /> was recently revised to reflect demonstration of a practical difficulty when granting a zoning <br /> code variance. The revision of the statute results in inconsistencies between our Code and the <br /> requirements in MN State Statute Chapter 462. <br /> The City Attorney has proposed revised language which is consistent with State Statute. The <br /> revised language proposes to change undue hardship references to practical difficulty in order to <br /> maintain consistency between State Statute and Orono's zoning codes. <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> Does the Planning Commission have any concerns with the ordinance amendment? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Planning Staff recommends approval of the language as proposed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.