My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/19/2011 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
09/19/2011 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2012 3:15:37 PM
Creation date
8/15/2012 3:15:35 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING CONIMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,September 19,2011 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> The applicant is requesting a variance to allow 29.9 percent hardcover within the 75-250 foot zone where <br /> 25 percent is normally allowed. Within the 0-75 foot zone,the existing lake access stair system is <br /> proposed to remain,resulting in 2 percent hardcover. <br /> The applicant is proposing to construct a detached garage with street facing doors 15 feet from Tonkawa <br /> Road where a 30-foot setback is required. The plan was designed with a 15-foot setback to allow for <br /> more open space between the home and garage,to reduce the proposed hardcover and to avoid importing <br /> excessive amounts of dirt fill to the site to move the garage further from the road. The narrowness of the <br /> lot makes it difficult to face the doors away from the street and have an adequate and functional driveway <br /> to serve the property. <br /> City Code requires that a turnaround be provided on site for a driveway with direct access to collector <br /> roadways. Tonkawa Road is a collector road. The Code also provides direction for the minimum <br /> dimensions of a turnaround to be eight feet wide by 12 feet deep. A portion of the existing off-site curb <br /> cut is wider than normal,which may currently function as a turnaround. However,in the future at <br /> Hennepin County's discretion,Tonkawa Road wilUmay be repaved and this existing paved area could be <br /> eliminated. <br /> The applicant has also provided an alternate plan which reflects the detached garage at the required 30- <br /> foot setback to illustrate the level of hardcover necessary to meet the setback requirement. Within the 75- <br /> 250 foot zone and a conforming detached garage setback, a variance to allow 2,586 square feet or 33.7 <br /> percent hardcover would be required. This plan results in 287 square feet more than needed for the <br /> garage at a 15-foot setback. <br /> Staff finds practical difficulties exist which support the granting of hardcover variances for the property. <br /> At 50 feet,the lot is narrow and the topography adds to the difficulty of locating a home and garage on <br /> the lot. The steepness of the property from the road to the lake creates an issue with regard to storm water <br /> drainage and the location of the existing homes on either side tend to bring the proposed home closer to <br /> the lake requiring either a longer driveway or sidewalks to access the home. However, adequate space <br /> should be provided on the subject property for the parking of vehicles as well as a safe turnaround so that <br /> bacldng out on Tonkawa Road isn't the only option. <br /> The request to locate the garage at 15 feet provides for neither the adequate turn around nor the space to <br /> park additional vehicles on the property. The necessary increase in hardcover to allow the additional 15 <br /> feet of driveway and a small bump out in the driveway to function as a turnaround is supported by the <br /> practice difficulties listed for the hardcover variance above and further supported by the property's need to <br /> access off the county road. <br /> Issues for consideration: <br /> 1. Does the Planning Commission find that the property owner proposes to use the property in a <br /> reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? <br /> 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the hardcover and setback variances,if granted,will not <br /> alter the essential character of the neighborhood? <br /> 3. Does the Commission�nd it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts <br /> created by the granting of the requested variances? <br /> Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.