Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING CONIlVIISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,May 16,2011 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Schoenzeit stated he would not require a minimum size on the property or a maximum percentage of the <br /> acreage either. <br /> Schwingler asked for clarification on what Chair Schoenzeit is referring to. Schwingler noted currently <br /> the City has a minimum 10 acre requirement to have a garden without a stntcture. Schwingler asked if <br /> Chair Schoenzeit is saying that you do not need to have a minimum size lot in order to have a garden. <br /> Schoenzeit indicated as long as they meet the setback for that zone,there should not be a size <br /> requirement. <br /> Curtis asked whether he is referring to a 10-foot setback in general or a 10-foot setback for that particular <br /> zoning district. . . . <br /> Schoenzeit noted if there is a principal structure setback in that particular zone,whatever zone the garden <br /> is in,it would need to meet that setback. Schoenzeit stated if it is in a 2-acre zone,the garden would need <br /> to meet the 30-foot structural setback. <br /> Schoenzeit asked what zone the proposed garden is located in. <br /> Curtis indicated it is in the 2-acre RR-1 district,which would require a 50-foot front and rear setback and <br /> a 30-foot side setback. <br /> Schoenzeit asked if they would still be able to have a 100'x 100'plot in there if they met those setbacks. <br /> Curtis stated she would like to avoid discussing this particular donation garden but that there is probably <br /> enough area to accommodate a 100'x 100'garden. Curtis indicated she is not sure whether that would <br /> � accommodate the helicopter pad,the parking, and�he garden. • <br /> Schoenzeit commented that the Planning Commission does not want to make it so complicated that a <br /> survey would be required to plant a garden. . <br /> Levang commented there are also elements of the topography that would come into play on where a <br /> garden could be located. Levang suggested the Planning Commission consider a 10-foot setback and that <br /> they have to allow the person to pick the spot that is the most conducive to their garden. <br /> Schoenzeit noted the Planning Commission has an obligation to the neighbors to ensure that the activities <br /> associated with the garden are copacetic. Schoenzeit commented that a community/donation garden is a <br /> wonderful idea but that the Planning Commission has responsibility to the adjoining properties. <br /> Alexander stated a 10-foot setback from all property lines is reasonable. <br /> Curtis indicated she would like a show of hands or some kind of indication on how each commissioner <br /> stands on each of these issues so she will be�able to provide a clear understanding on each of these points <br /> to the City Council. <br /> It was the consensus of the Planning Commission that a 10-foot setback from all property lines should be <br /> required. <br /> Page <br /> 11 <br />