Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,March 21,2011 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Gaffron stated the property owner would not have to come in for any additional approval to operate that <br /> accessory use but would have to comply with whatever regulations are currently in place. The City has a <br /> licensing process at the present time. If the City would like to regulate accessory uses through the <br /> licensing process,it should be considered whether or not that is made a condition of the accessory use. <br /> Curtis noted it is covered under the zoning code as well. Each marina use is expected to comply with the <br /> zoning code. <br /> Gaffron stated there is a list of 12 or 15 conditions that any conditional use would need to comply with. <br /> Leskinen asked if an accessory use would adequately address any regulatory issues the City might have. <br /> Gaffron indicated it would depend on how the individual use is written into the code. <br /> Feuss noted that a marina could have 100 slips dedicated to rental use at the present time. <br /> Leskinen commented the accessory use could be written to say that rentals cannot exceed 25 percent of <br /> the total usage. <br /> Gaffron stated the use that would be allowed could be limited to a certain percentage without asking for <br /> approval by the City Council. <br /> Leskinen stated with the interim use permits,it would give the City some flexibility in addressing <br /> individual problems. Leskinen stated an interim use permit can be subject to periodic review, and asked � <br /> if there were a trigger that would terminate the interim use permit,whether that would be reviewed or <br /> whether it would automatically terminate the IUP without a review. . <br /> Gaffron stated it would likely trigger a review. Under a conditional use permit, once that use is no longer <br /> in existence,the permit would still stay with the property. <br /> Curtis stated the Planning Commission under an interim use permit could attach the condition that if the <br /> property changes hand,it would need to be reviewed since it would not be tied to the land. <br /> Thiesse asked if the interim use permit could be transferred to a different property owner. <br /> Gaffron indicated it could not and would be tied to the property that it is issued for. <br /> Feuss stated unless the interim use permit identifies with certainty what would cause it to cease,it could <br /> ' become permanent. <br /> Curtis stated if the zoning on the property is changed,it would cause the interim use permit to expire. <br /> Feuss pointed out that at the time the interim use permit is established,it would be impossible to list all <br /> the possibilities that would terminate the interim use permit. Feuss stated she does not feel it makes sense <br /> to use this issue as a guinea pig since the City does not have any prior experience with interim use <br /> permits. <br /> Page <br /> 19 <br />