My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/22/2011 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
02/22/2011 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2012 3:10:07 PM
Creation date
8/15/2012 3:10:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Tuesday, February 22,2011 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#11-3498 KRAUS-ANDERSON,875 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST, CONTINUED) <br /> The memory care units would be located on a secured floor. The amenities include a commercial kitchen, <br /> assisted living dining room,with the memory care unit having a separate dining room, a spa or bathing <br /> area,theatre, fitness area,library, and computer room. The typical unit plan would consist of a living <br /> room,bedroom, small kitchenette containing a range, and a bath/shower area. Some units will have larger <br /> bedrooms. The studio units will consist of a living room,bath, and kitchen area. <br /> Alexander displayed the proposed materials for the building to the Planning Commission. <br /> Feuss asked where the two non-wetland areas are located. <br /> Steve Johnston,Civil Engineer, stated those two areas are not depicted on the plan but they are in the area <br /> of the existing septic system for the daycare. The swale for the parking lot was created at the time the <br /> daycare facility was constructed and it has developed wetland characteristics over the years but it is not <br /> technically classi�ed as a wetland. <br /> Feuss asked what would happen with those areas under this proposal. <br /> Johnston indicated they would be covered by the parking lot. Johnston noted the appropriate government <br /> agencies have looked at the so-called wetland areas and have determined they should not be classified as <br /> a wetland. <br /> Schoenzeit asked what the grade elevation the Luce Line Trail is and where it would hit the building. <br /> Schoenzeit commented it appears the trail would be at the roofline elevation. <br /> Johnston displayed two photographs taken from the Luce Line Trail. Johnston pointed out the roofline <br /> would be hidden by the berm on one end of the building and that the peak of the roof is actually eight feet <br /> higher than the trail on the other end. <br /> Neudecker indicated to the ridge of the roof is 30 feet. <br /> Schoenzeit stated the elevations are attractive from the grade of the parking lot but that the observers from <br /> the trail would get the appearance of a warehouse building. Schoenzeit suggested larger gable roofs be <br /> incorporated in the design to help break up the long, continuous roofline. <br /> Neudecker noted they are planning some gable roofs at the ends. They are a lower pitched gable roof at <br /> 24.5 feet, which is below the 30 feet allowed. <br /> Schoenzeit encouraged some thought be given to the appearance of the building from the Luce Line. <br /> Neudecker indicated they are also planning some landscaping,particularly evergreen trees, adjacent to the <br /> trail. <br /> Alexander stated their goal is to screen the building and to have it blend into the site. <br /> Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.