My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/22/2011 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
02/22/2011 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2012 3:10:07 PM
Creation date
8/15/2012 3:10:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Tuesday, February 22,2011 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#11-3498 KRAUS-ANDERSON, 875 WAYZATA BOiJLEVARD WEST, CONTINUED) <br /> deciduous and coniferous species,including overstory trees,understory trees, shrubs, flowers and <br /> groundcover materials according to the RPUD Code Section 78-626(14)(b)(1). <br /> The site perimeter is 3,292 linear feet. The building footprint is 24,500 square feet(without the canopy). <br /> According to the applicant's plan,tliey have used a perimeter based on the developed portion of the site <br /> rather than the entire property resulting in a lower number of trees required. The plan should be revised <br /> to address the number of trees as required by code. <br /> The plan as proposed is short 24 deciduous and 10 coniferous trees. The plans exceed the required <br /> number of shrubs considerably by 294 shrubs,but the excess of shrubs does not offset the required trees. <br /> The plan should also identify all of the healthy trees to be removed from the site that are over six inches <br /> in diameter. The applicant has been asked for this information and additional detail in the landscape <br /> plans. The revised plans should be received,reviewed,and approved by Staff prior to the City Council <br /> meeting. <br /> The applicant has provided building plans, colored elevations, and a materials sample board for the <br /> Planning Commission review. <br /> The City may require a traffic analysis to be prepared by a registered traffic engineer approved by the <br /> City to assess potential traffic impacts on local streets. All access to the development is proposed to be <br /> the existing access on Wayzata Boulevard. Wayzata Boulevard is not a local street but is classified as an <br /> "A"Minor Arterial. As with the Concept Plan review,the City has not requested a traffic study for this <br /> project. The applicant will have to obtain the appropriate access permit from MN/Dot or Hennepin <br /> depending on the status of jurisdiction. <br /> All RPUD developments shall be subject to the general performance standards for lighting. The applicant <br /> has submitted a proposed lighting plan. The plan appears to be in conformity with the general lighting <br /> standards of the zoning code. The City's most comprehensive lighting standards are contained within <br /> Section 78-831 which are appropriate to use as a guide for reviewing this residential developmentâany <br /> inconsistencies will be noted prior to Council approval. The applicant will be required to provide plans <br /> and specifications for each type of fixture with the building permit application. Ideally,the fixtures will <br /> be shielded and downcast. <br /> When any portion of the project is within 1,000 feet of a public trail system,pedestrian access shall be <br /> provided to the trail system by means of a public trail constructed at the developer's expense. The <br /> applicant has not proposed an access to the Luce Line Trail due to the nature of the development. <br /> Because the proposal is for a multi-unit residential developed guided for urban density, the project is <br /> subject to the requirements of Orono's Conservation Design ordinance. The applicant has prepared a <br /> Conservation Design Master Plan for the site. There are some minor outstanding elements of this plan <br /> which the applicant is continuing to develop. Staff feels that the remaining items can be addressed before <br /> the City Council reviews the application. <br /> Master development approval is contingent upon the successful execution of a Development Agreement <br /> between the applicantldeveloper and the City. The agreement shall address all specific City requirements <br /> Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.