Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE , <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,June 20,2016 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Bollis stated it is their intent to go with the plan that has already been approved if this plan is not <br /> approved. Bollis indicated they are attempting to be neighborly and environmentally friendly with the <br /> proposed revisions. <br /> Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 6:50 p.m. <br /> Cheryl Miller, 195 Kintyre Lane, stated she is here tonight to express her support for the plan being <br /> proposed tonight. <br /> Tom Fleming, 300 Stubbs Bay Road, stated his house is screened by trees from the northerly outlot <br /> driveway corridor trees and that his concern is going from a 12-foot driveway to a 24-foot road may <br /> negatively impact the tree buffer. <br /> Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 6:53 p.m. <br /> Leskinen stated historically the City does not create substandard lots or back lots,which will result in the <br /> need for variances. Leskinen stated in her view it will set a dangerous precedent. <br /> Schoenzeit stated it seems odd on the surface that fewer lots is less compliant but that it is being done at <br /> the cost of the substandard roads,which is really the problem with the new proposal. Schoenzeit noted <br /> this is a clean sheet and that there is no reason to approve a large number of substandard lots. Schoenzeit <br /> stated the original 7-lot plan is not broken and that they don't need to fix it. <br /> Lemke stated he understands the desire to preserve more trees but that it will create more problems. <br /> Olson indicated he is in agreement with what has been said. <br /> Gaffron stated the Planning Commission can either table the application or vote on it and send it to <br /> Council. If the Planning Commission is going to recommend denial, Gaffron suggested the applicant be <br /> asked if he would like to redesign it or whether he would like to proceed forward to the City Council. <br /> Gaffron noted regardless of the action tonight,the original approval is still valid, and if this application is <br /> ultimately approved by Council, it would be prudent for the City to negate the original approval. <br /> Thiesse asked Bollis whether he would like to table or move on to council. <br /> Bollis indicated he would prefer to move on to Council.. <br /> Lemke moved, Schoenzeit seconded,to recommend denial of Application No. 15-3763A, <br /> Christopher Bollis,200-350 Stubbs Bay Road North. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> 3. #16-3833 JOHN BOWLSBY, 1025 SPRING HILL ROAD,VARIANCES,6:56 P.M.— <br /> 7:02 P.M. <br /> John Bowlsby, Applicant,was present. <br /> Curtis stated the property owners are seeking variances in order to construct an in-ground pool within the <br /> average lakeshore setback and within the required 100-foot setback from Long Lake. The average <br /> — — -- Page 4 <br />