07-18-2016 Planning Commission Packet

Home Browse Search

FILE#16-3839 13 July 2016 Page 5 of 6 Septic System Status The property is served by City sewer. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B,and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds the requested variance to encroach into the 75-foot lakeshore setback is minimal;the applicant is unable to construct any additions to the home without variances from the lake setback. Although the requested hardcover variances within the 0-75 foot zone and on the Tier 1 property as a whole result in no net increase in hardcover for the property, staff would encourage the applicant to further limit the proposed hardcover. The distance between Ferndale Road and the home necessitate a specific minimal length of driveway however the proposed driveway which includes a considerable loop may not be supported by practical difficulties. The driveway replacement does result in a reduction in driveway hardcover however this is offset by the structural addition over the driveway near the home. Staff suggests reductions could be made to the proposed driveway in conjunction with some mitigating measures to encourage infiltration —such as raingardens, permeable pavement,etc. Staff finds the proposed side setback variance is reasonable considering the orientation of the home, and the resulting 10 foot setback allowing for adequate open space between the garage and the home to the east. Engineer Comments The City engineer has conducted a cursory review of the applicant's plan; no issues were noted. A comprehensive review will be done at the time of the building permit. Public Comments As of the drafting of this memo, no comments from the public have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variances, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variances? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Commission Options for Consideration The Planning Commission may consider the following alternative motions: 1. Approval of the hardcover, lake setback, and side setback variances as requested; or 2. Approval of the lake setback and side setback variances.Approval of hardcover variances resulting in a specified net reduction in hardcover and/or in conjunction with stormwater management BMPs implemented on site;or 3. Denial of the variances as requested.