Laserfiche WebLink
t , , � <br /> 16-3847 <br /> Page 9 <br /> Shadywood Villas <br /> July 18, 2016 <br /> RPUD standards requires a significant level of development flexibility. Does Planning <br /> Commission have any concerns about the lot widths, setbacks or other RPUD standards <br /> for which flexibility is required in this proposal? <br /> 4. Is the Commission comfortable moving the project forward, recognizing that the <br /> landscaping plan, engineering and storm-water management plans have not been fully <br /> vetted. <br /> 5. Should trails or sidewalks be provided to connect this neighborhood with the community <br /> at large? <br /> 6. Is it imperative that 10% private open space be provided by the developer? <br /> 7. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> This development proposal exhibits a significant level of refinement as a result of the developer's <br /> response to issues raised during the Sketch Plan Review process and primary Staff comments. <br /> Discussion of the above topics and any conclusions reached by the Planning Commission should <br /> provide applicant and staff with direction as to whether or how the proposed plat should be further <br /> revised. Any remaining topics left unaddressed to date should be brought up for discussion. <br /> The Planning Commission may recommend approval or denial of the three actions requested or <br /> any combination thereof. If denial is recommended, reasons should be given. <br /> The Planning Commission may also choose to table the application, allowing the developer and <br /> staff to address any issues raised. <br /> Should the Commission wish to approve the applications, the following conditions are suggested: <br /> Comprehensive Plan Amendment, with the direction that that the City should identify alternate <br /> sites for higher density development. <br /> Rezoning to RPUD, to be formally approved at the time of final plat approval. <br /> Preliminary plat approval subject to the following conditions: <br /> 1. Flexibility being granted for the lot area,width and setback standards of the RPUD District. <br /> Hardcover will be limited to the assigned Tier 4 level of 50% on each individual lot. The <br /> 0.50 FAR shall be adhered to on each individual lot. <br /> 2. Development shall be subject to adherence to the findings included in the Conservation <br /> Design report, also subject to removal of buckthorn on the site. <br /> 3. Significant trees to be preserved to the extent possible and as shown on the landscaping <br /> plans. <br /> 4. Applicant to confirm with SHPO that that there are no archaeological sites within the <br /> property. <br /> 5. Preliminary plat to be reviewed by Park Commission and Fire Chief for comments and <br /> recommendations prior to Council review of preliminary plat. <br />