My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-18-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
07-18-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:40:49 PM
Creation date
8/25/2016 2:49:34 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
228
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
�J <br /> 16-3847 Page c '� <br /> Shadywood Villas <br /> July 18,2016 <br /> follows: <br /> (16) Flexibility. The uniqueness of each RPUD requires that specifications and standards for <br /> streets, utilities, public facilities and subdivisions may be subject to modification from the city <br /> ordinances ordinarily governing them. The city council may therefare approve streets, utilities, <br /> public facilities and land subdivisions which are not in compliance with usual specifications or <br /> ordinance requirements, if it finds that strict adherence to such standards or requirements is not <br /> required to meet the intent of this section or to protect the health, safety or welfare of the residents <br /> of the RPUD, the surrounding area or the city as a whole. <br /> This proposed development concept will require a significant departure (flexibility) from the <br /> RPUD district lot standards for individual homesites. The table below identifies specific standards <br /> which would require flexibility: <br /> RPUD District Minimum Proposed Fle�bility <br /> SFR Standard Lot Standards Re uired? <br /> Minimum project size: 5 acres 2.34 acres Yes <br /> Minimum lot size: 15,000 square feet 7,800 s.£—61,400 s.£ Yes <br /> (incl. wetlands) <br /> 4 of 7 lots< 15,000 s.f. <br /> Minimum lot width at setback line: 90 feet 50' min and typical/70 ft Yes <br /> widest <br /> Minimum lot de th: 125 feet Varies -all 150' + No <br /> Minimum front building setback: 25 feet 20' feet min. (25' to l,es <br /> Shad ood) <br /> Minimum side ard setback: 10 feet Side 1: 7 feet Yes <br /> Minimum rear yard setback: Lesser of 40' or Lesser of 40' or No <br /> 20%of lot de th(30 feet) 20% of lot de th <br /> Maximum FAR: 0.50 .18 (assumes 1400 sq ft No <br /> sin le sto home) <br /> Wetland building setback: Greater of 35 feet or 35 feet(Lot 6) yes <br /> MCWD buffer lus 10 feet <br /> Private Recreational Area: 10% of gross project area 0%proposed Yes <br /> Building hei ht: Maximum of 30 feet (Not defined) No <br /> All dwelling units, including manufactured homes, shall have a depth of at least 20 feet for at <br /> least 50 percent of their width. All dwelling units, including manufactured homes, shall have a No <br /> width of at least 20 feet for at least 50 percent of their depth. <br /> Relationship to Surrounding Development <br /> The subject parcel in many ways represents a transition between the commercial and institutional <br /> uses along Shadywood and the residential uses on Lydiard Circle/Avenue to the south, and Kelly <br /> Avenue to the west. The proposed development will have little to no interaction with the adjacent <br /> residential neighborhoods as there are no vehicular connections or trails out of the property to the <br /> south, north, or west. The portion of the project adjacent to Kelly Avenue is currently a wetland, <br /> there are no plans to impact this wetland, other than mitigation of invasive plant material. <br /> Conservation Design <br /> The applicants have submitted a Conservation Development report prepared by ISG pursuant to <br /> the City's Conservation Design ordinances. The executive summary is attached (Exhibit E), a <br /> full copy is available on the cities website. Key elements of the report include a review of the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.