Laserfiche WebLink
. <br /> Item 3 <br /> Date Application Received: 05/13/16 O <br /> Date Application Considered as Complete:05/13/16 � �O <br /> 60-Day Review Period Expires: 07/12/16 <br /> � � <br /> y � <br /> To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members `�� �� <br /> Jessica Loftus, City Administrator qkfSH��� <br /> From: Melanie Curtis, Planner mcc <br /> Date: 14 June 2016 <br /> Subject: #16-3833,John Bowlsby, 1025 Spring Hill Road, <br /> Variances <br /> Public Hearing <br /> Application Summary: The applicant is requesting variances in order to construct an in-ground <br /> pool within the average lakeshore setback and within the required 100'setback from Long Lake. <br /> Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends approval of the setback variances for the <br /> pool. <br /> List of Exhibits <br /> ExhibitA. Application <br /> Exhibit 8. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form <br /> Exhibit C. Proposed Survey/Site Plan <br /> Exhibit D. Submitted Hardcover Calculations <br /> Exhibit E. Resolution No. 6519 <br /> Exhibit F. Resolution No. 6544 <br /> Exhibit G. Property Owners List <br /> Exhibit H. Plat Map <br /> Background <br /> This property owner was before the Planning Commission in 2015 seeking approvals for <br /> variances to allow additions to the home as well as an in-ground pool located within the 75-foot <br /> setback area. Long Lake is classified as a recreational development (RD) lake for setback <br /> purposes; properties served by City sewer on RD lakes have a required 75-foot structural <br /> setback from the OWHL(944.3'). This property is served by a private septic system and must <br /> �meet a 100-foot structural setback. Initially the property owners sought an extension of the City <br /> sewer to their property which would have changed the setback status. That sewer request has <br /> been withdrawn. <br /> The variances for the additions to the home were approved on June 22, 2015 via Resolution No. <br /> 6519 (Exhibit F),the variance for the pool location within the 75-foot setback was denied. <br /> Resolution 6544(Exhibit G) adopted on November 28, 2015 amended the approvals granted by <br /> Resolution No. 6519 modifying the configuration of the additions to the home;the pool at that <br /> time was shown to be in a location meeting the average lakeshore and 100-foot lake setback. <br /> At this time the applicants seek setback variance approvals to rotate the pool location 90 <br />