Laserfiche WebLink
. <br /> FILE#16-3832 <br /> June 20,2016 <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> Practical Difficulties Statement <br /> Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form attached as Exhibit A. <br /> Analysis (Practical Difficulties,Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan) <br /> Staff's analysis of the practical difficulties is outlined above. <br /> Public Comments <br /> During the public comment period at the Council meeting, neighboring property owners spoke in <br /> opposition to the conversion of the park to an off-leash park. They noted concerns that the fence <br /> would impact wildlife movement and habitat, and a fence adjacent to their property would <br /> negatively impact their property (The fence has since been pulled back from the property line to <br /> allow for wildlife movement and to prevent interaction from the park to the private property. The <br /> comments received to date center more on the presence of fencing versus the location of the <br /> fencing. The minutes reflecting public comment are attached in Exhibit D. <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the <br /> property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? <br /> 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variances, if granted, will not alter the <br /> essential character of the neighborhood? <br /> 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the <br /> impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? <br /> 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br />