My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/21/2010 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
06/21/2010 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2012 2:37:23 PM
Creation date
8/15/2012 2:37:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� � t <br /> MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,June 21,2010 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. � <br /> (#10-3470 STEPHEN&PAMELA WII,SON,3508 IVY PLACE,CONTINUED) <br /> not want to be required to remove those items since it would make it difficult for the owners to sell the <br /> property. The owners are also agreeable to a drainage agreement. The public would still be able to <br /> access the lake the same way as in the past. <br /> Wilson stated she has resided in the property since 1982 and that the use by the public has essentially <br /> remained the same. <br /> Kang asked if there are any drainage issues. <br /> Wilson indicated there are not and that the new culvert has helped with the drainage. Rock has also been <br /> added to help divert the runoff. Wilson commented she would like the property to remain the same. <br /> Feuss stated the applicant has indicated a willingness to negotiate an encroachment agreement and that <br /> perhaps that avenue should be pursued first. . <br /> Kelly stated the 2010 agreement is not the same as the one proposed in 1981 and that they would like to <br /> meet somewhere in the middle. Kelly submitted some color photocopies of the property. <br /> Turner stated Staff was looking for removal of the areas that did not exist in 1981,which include the wall, <br /> the patio, and the trash enclosure. The retaining wall was in existence in 1981. <br /> Wilson noted there have always been some steps going down to the lake. <br /> Schoenzeit asked if the proposed encroachment agreement says that the improvements within the City's <br /> right-of-way are at the property owner's risk. <br /> Turner indicated that is correct. Turner stated it would not be necessary to include the driveway in the <br /> encroachment agreement since access to the property across the City's right-of-way is a permissible use. <br /> ' Chair Kang opened the public hearing,at 7:17 p.m. , <br /> Kathy Wright, 3287 Casco Circle, stated she wanted to get some additional information regarding the <br /> application. Since they moved out to Casco Circle,they were told that you could access the lake,but <br /> pointed out that the property owners attempt to make the public access points hidden. Wright indicated <br /> she did not have any idea what was being discussed in this application,which prompted her to attend <br /> tonight's meeting. <br /> Paul Larson, 3865 Shoreline Drive,indicated he lived at 3225 Casco Circle for seven years. Larson noted s <br /> he is one of the real estate agents on this property. If you look at the survey,you can see that the entire <br /> city street is encroaching on the property across the road. The street is very narrow and elimination of <br /> off-street parking does not make sense since it would create a safety hazard. The 2010 encroachment <br /> agreement requires the removal of the concrete steps,the patio,and the trash enclosure. This is a walkout <br /> rambler and is in need of improvement. � <br /> Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.