My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/21/2010 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
06/21/2010 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/15/2012 2:37:23 PM
Creation date
8/15/2012 2:37:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� ,� . ' ? � <br /> MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,June 21,2010 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. � <br /> (#10-3473 CITY OF ORONO,AMENDMENT TO 78-624,RPUD CONDITIONAL USES, CONT) <br /> Residential District,together with a variety of other care facilities. Additionally the B-4 Office and <br /> Professional Business District allows"nursing homes"as a conditional use in the following context: <br /> "78-734, Conditional Uses. Nursing homes,hospitals,rest homes or retirement homes,provided the site <br /> shall contain not less than 600 square feet of lot area for each person to be accommodated, and no <br /> building is located less than 35 feet from the side lot,line." <br /> These or nearly identical provisions have been in the Code since the 1960s. Because there are no <br /> definitions in the code for nursing home,rest home,retirement home,hospital,or sanitarium, one must <br /> make a reasonable interpretation of what they are. Sanitariums and hospitals seem to connote an <br /> institutional level of health care,whereas rest homes,nursing homes, and retirement homes are fairly <br /> synonymous and have more of a residential character with some level of living assistance. Each of the <br /> above uses suggests a living situation that in something other than the standard single-family dwelling <br /> situation. <br /> Gaffron stated it would be a stretch,however,to conclude that nursing homes are the direct equivalent of <br /> multifamily dwellings. If we were to make that leap,then we would have to assume that multifamily <br /> swellings were intended to be allowed in the RR-1B and B-4 districts,which they clearly were not. <br /> In reviewing how other neighboring cities' codes address nursing homes,assisted living and the like, <br /> Staff found that Plymouth allows as a conditional use in its RMF-2 district residential care facilities such <br /> as nursing homes, assisted living facilities and similar facilities,but excludes hospitals, sanitariums or <br /> similar institutions. Minnetonka allows as a conditional use in its R-4 district public or private nursing or <br /> convalescent homes. Golden Valley allows as a pernutted use in its R-4 multifamily district senior and <br /> physical disability housing. It appears there is a wide variety of ways in which cities have addressed the <br /> topic;it appears less common to see them allowed in a single-family district. <br /> •The RPUD District is the only district in which Orono allows multifamily attached dwellings as a <br /> permitted use, and the RPUD code section establishes specific standards for such dwellings with regards <br /> to setbacks, separate of uses,height limitations and outside storage limitations, as well as other <br /> development standards applicable to both multifamily attached and single-family dwelling developments. <br /> Because assisted living facilities are likely to be somewhat similar in character to multifamily uses in their <br /> impacts, and because the appropriate standards for regulating those impacts are generally in place within <br /> the RPUD District standards, it follows that"assisted living facilities"would be an appropriate use in the <br /> RPUD District. <br /> Establishing"assisted living facilities"as a pernutted use in the RPUD District would subject it directly <br /> to all the standards established in that district, all of which were created to be applicable to strictly <br /> residential use. The value in making"assisted living facilities"a conditional use is the ability of the City <br /> to impose additional appropriate conditions in its approvals. Staff believes it would be most appropriate <br /> to add"assisted living facilities"to the RPUD District as a conditional use. This has the additional <br /> benefit of subjecting the use to the various general conditional use standards that ensure appropriate <br /> development. <br /> Page 2 , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.