Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,January 18,2010 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> *7. #10-3439 SEAN AND MARIE McLEAN,25 CYGNET PLACE—SETBACK VARIANCE <br /> Berg moved,Schoenzeit seconded,to recommend approval of Application#10-3439, Sean and <br /> Marie McLean,25 Cygnet Place,granting of a setback variance. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. <br /> 8. #10-3440 ROBERT AND MARY SANSEVERE,745 ORCHARD PARK ROAD, <br /> VARIANCE,7:17 P.M.—7:36 P.M. <br /> Bob and Mary Sansevere,Applicants,were present. <br /> Curtis stated the applicants are requesting a variance in order to construct an additional oversized(3,000 <br /> square foot) accessory structure on their property where one oversized accessory structure exists and only <br /> one oversized structure is permitted. The applicants would like to construct a 3,000 square foot riding <br /> arena on their property in order to allow for year-round training of their miniature horses. There also is a <br /> 1200 square foot barn on the property. <br /> The property contains two wetland areas, is bordered by Orchard Park Road on the east and County <br /> Road 6 on the north. The applicants have been searching for a solution that will allow for a year-round <br /> indoor training area on their property. Taking the existing 1200 square foot barn into account, <br /> they would be allowed to construct 4-5 smaller buildings, each up to 999 square feet, on their property. <br /> While this would not fully achieve their goal of a completely enclosed arena,the applicants considered a <br /> configuration whereby the buildings could be aligned in a circle 10 feet apart to allow for intermittent <br /> lengths of protected space or a tunnel for the horses to run through. <br /> The property consists of nine plus acres and is permitted a total of 6,000 square feet of accessory <br /> structure. <br /> The property contains two acres of Manage 2 classification wetlands. Manage 2 wetlands require a <br /> 25-foot buffer and a 20-foot structural setback from the buffer. It is not feasible to conduct an <br /> accurate wetland delineation during the winter months. However,John Smyth,the City's wetland <br /> consultant,visited the site and placed flags along a conservative wetland boundary line. The applicants <br /> have shown their proposed building exceeding the required 45 foot setback from both wetland areas. <br /> The City can collect an escrow with a building permit issued in the winter months which will <br /> provide the guarantee and security needed to assure that the wetland ordinance is adhered to when the <br /> weather permits. This project may trigger the wetland buffer requirement. <br /> Planning Staff recommends approval of a variance to allow an additional oversized accessory structure to <br /> be constructed on the property with any additional conditions the Planning Commission deems <br /> appropriate. <br /> Curtis illustrated on the overhead the location of the house and the proposed barn on the overhead. <br /> Schoenzeit asked if the exterior materials and colors would be required to match the main residence. <br /> Curtis indicated this proposal would not fall under that code since the property consists of over two <br /> acres. The Planning Commission could require that as a condition of approval. Sansevere indicated they <br /> would attempt to match the other existing pole barn since that structure is closer to the proposed barn than <br /> Page 7 <br />