Laserfiche WebLink
10-3467 <br /> � 13 September 2010 <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br /> Staff Comments <br /> The City Engineer reviewed the applicant's initial request for a detached garage, but has not <br /> reviewed this revised plan for an attached garage. Staff finds that the applicant has a <br /> reasonable use of the property and the hardcover proposed is not supported by a hardship. <br /> Further, the applicant has not demonstrated that enforcing the hardcover provisions of the <br /> Zoning Ordinance deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of their property. <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. Does the Planning Commission find the property owner has a reasonable use of the <br /> property absent a garage? <br /> 2. Are there any other issues for consideration? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Planning Staff recommends denial of the hardcover variances for the project. <br /> . <br />