Laserfiche WebLink
. , , ' <br /> CODE COMPLIANCE REVIEW 2 <br /> , CODE � OMMENTS <br /> eet the following standards: haracter with a single story and a gable roof. <br /> 1) All exterior wall finishes on any building + <br /> sha11 be: he site plan approval includes building design <br /> . Face brick or Natural Stone; d materials. <br /> � . Specially designed precast concrete units if , <br /> e surfaces have been integrally treated with an <br /> pplied decorative material or texture; <br /> . Factory fabricated and finished metal r <br /> amed panels, if the panel materials are of any <br /> f those noted in subsections (g)(1)a-b of this � <br /> ection; or - <br /> Other materials as may be approved by the � <br /> ouncil. , <br /> Combinations of such materials shall be <br /> ernutted. � <br /> � ) Drainage. No land shall be developed and rainage from the front part of the parking lot <br /> o use sha11 be permitted tha`t results in water d the roof of the proposed building would <br /> off causing floods, erosion or deposits on ow through filtration basins into an existing <br /> djacent properties. Site and drainage plans atch basin in tlie east corner of the site. The <br /> sha11 be submitted by the applicant in such atch basin empties into the storm pipe system <br /> etail as required by the council, and those ong Shadywood Road. <br /> lans shall be reviewed by the city engineer . <br /> efore submission to the planning commission rainage from the rear of the parking lot and <br /> d council for approval. Such runoff may be ture building would flow though filtration <br /> equired to be properly channeled into a natural asins into the larger wetland. <br /> atercourse,ponding area, storm drain or other � <br /> ublic facilities. Any change in grade affecting he drainage from the area between the parking <br /> ater runoff, whether onto adjacent property or ot and southeast property line would continue <br /> therwise, must be in compliance with the o flow into the smaller wetland and overflow <br /> . surface water management plan and shall be ' to the larger wetland. Less runoff would <br /> - onsistent with other applicable regulations or ollow this route than does currently because the <br /> rovisions of this Code and subject to the ainage area is much reduced, <br /> pproval of other agencies having jurisdiction <br /> ver the area affected by the drainage. e City Engineer has reviewed the drainage <br /> lan. Corrections are required but with those <br /> orrections the plan should satisfy these and <br /> ther applicable requirements. <br /> he project will require a Storm Water Permit <br /> . om the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. <br /> he permit cannot be applied for until the <br /> , roject has City approval. The project is <br /> esigned with the MCWD requirements in <br /> ind. It is not anticipated that the MCWD <br /> ernut will require noticeable changes to the <br /> site, ading, and landsca e lan. ' <br /> i) Height.No structure or buildin shall he buildin is a single story. � � <br />