Laserfiche WebLink
� � °� � . .. � <br /> o �, o . , . _ . . . ^ : <br /> - � �CITY of ORONO <br /> �� ��ti . � : � � : . . <br /> �t �p . �, RfSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL . <br /> �kESH.O�' . .NO. 5. 8 C O . . <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR-1B One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning <br /> District which requires a minimum lot area of 1.0 acre and a minimtun lot�width <br /> of 140'. . � <br /> 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on <br /> July 20, 2009 and voted 3-4 to recommend approval of variances based on the . <br /> following findings: <br /> a. The property contains 20,037 s.f. in axea and has 117' in width. <br /> b. The lot is substandard in area and a residence has existed on the property for <br /> many years. <br /> c. There is no additional land available to bring the lot width or lot area into <br /> conformity. . <br /> d. At 14°% structural coverage proposed the proposed plan meets the structural <br /> , lot coverage limitation of 15%. <br /> e. The home expansions are outside of the 0-75' setback area. <br /> f. Rather than rebuilding further from the lake, removing numerous trees, and <br /> disturbing more of the property the applicants have proposed to utilize the <br /> existing nome location. The proposed st*ucture cQmplies S�,�zth side yar� and � <br /> . street yard setback requirements. <br /> g. The applicants will agree to filing a protective covenant in order to protect the <br /> significant trees on the property. <br /> h. Pavers will be utilized for the patios and sidewalks for increased permeability. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by <br /> the applicants and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the <br /> health, safety and welfaze of the community. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to <br /> it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district;that granting <br /> the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />