07-19-2010 Planning Commission Packet

Home Browse Search

vaf'iance request, we reverse and remand to the City for reconsideration under the correct standard. Liebeler owns property located in Minnetonka. Krummenacher is Liebeler's neighbor to the west. Liebeler's property consists of a 2.4-acre lot, which contains a 2,975-square-foot home and an attached two-car garage. The property also contains a detached flat-roofed garage that a previous owner constructed sometime in the 1940s. The City has an ordiz�ance requiring that the detached garage be set back a minimum of 50 feet from the property's boundary line. Minnetonka City Code § 300.10. Liebeler's garage was constructed before this ordinance went into effect, and it does not satisfy the setback requirement. 5pecifically, the garage is nonconforming because it is set back only 17 feet from the front yard lot line. Because the_garage was constructed before the ordinance became_effecti.v._e, however, the garage is a permissible nonconformity. ___ _ _._ - On March 31, 2008, Liebeler applied for a variance to expand the detached garage by adding a pitched roof and a second-story room above the garage that could be used as a yoga studio and craft room. Liebeler's proposal was to renovate the garage itself, both to fix its leakage problems and improve its appearance, and also to expand the garage by adding a living space above it. Because adding a second story to the garage would result in a vertica.l expansion of a nonconforming structure, Liebeler was required, under the Minnetonka City Code, to apply for a variance from the City.i See Minnetonka City 1 It appears that Liebeler did not attempt to move the garage to a conforming location because the unusual characteristics of the lot made relocation impracticable. � Liebeler's lot is L-shaped with only 45-feet of frontage on the road. Moreover, there is a ' (Footnote continued on next page.) I 3 � � ,I �