Laserfiche WebLink
.? ' <br /> •:. I <br /> FILE#10-3472 <br /> 14 June 2010 <br /> ' Page 3 of 8 <br /> and assumed correct for the purposes of this review. <br /> Wetland Required Parking/Pavement <br /> Wetland Classification Wetland + Building (not allowed w/in <br /> Buffer Setback buffer area � <br /> Wetland #1 Mana e 1 55' Meets setbacks Meets setbacks <br /> Wetland#2 Mana e 3 26.5' Meets setbacks Meets setbacks <br /> Wetland A More information re uired—shown as a rain arden area on the lans <br /> Wetland #4 Mana e 3 26.5' Meets setbacks Meets setbacks <br /> Uses. Each property rezoned to RPUD shall only be used for the use or uses for which the site <br /> is designated in the comprehensive plan. <br /> • The proposed use, as a multifamily facility, generally meets the comprehensive p/an <br /> standards. However as an assisted living facility is not specifically listed within the <br /> RPUD district as an allowed or conditiona/ use the Planning Commission shall consider <br /> adding assisted living facilities as a RPUD conditiona/use. <br /> Sewer availabititv. A site proposed to be rezoned to RPUD with proposed density greater than <br /> one unit per two acres must be in the metropolitan urban services area (MUSA) and must be <br /> serviced by municipal sewer. . <br /> � � • Sewer and water are available to this site, and it is within the MUSA. ' � <br /> F Densitv Each development in the RPUD district shall have a density within the range specified <br /> in the plan for the specific site. . <br /> • This project will result in an overall density of 8.4 units per buildable acre, which <br /> conforms to the 2010-2030 CMP guiding of this prope►ty. <br /> Site coveraqe. Hard surFace coverage and floor area ratios (FARs) shall be limited per the <br /> following table. <br /> _ • The site meets the hard surface coverage and FAR limitations. - <br /> -�;� ���,:µ.�w�� =.�„�°° ��,,.•� Maximum Hard �?: =s.�. y � �t� <br /> Comprehensnre Plan.�: - S�te Hard - Maximum Floor y � �M �. <br /> . °� ��- ...� � t � ;: Surface »� - 9 �:,�- Area Ratio S�te FAR, -- <br /> Des�gnation,� i; ; *: Covera e % Surface % FAR* � " 4�� � ' <br /> ,. .,�. .,.- <�..�.; <br /> High density` ; �� tr , .� �ti, , r�;. ,,` v d <br /> � ��' .x=�,� ,r �� ��, ,� <br /> �. 4� * ..�; �: s �. � , s <br /> �esidential (m excessy ; 50 13%� k y>} 1.0 0 1� �� <br /> 'ofp�6.0µun�its�er;acre <� a" ��; ' '3 '°S � <br /> Heiqht limitations. For properties guided for residential use in the comprehensive plan, a <br /> building height limit of 30 feet shall apply. No mansard or flat roofed multiple-family building will <br /> be allowed. � <br /> • It appears from the submitted elevation drawings the building has a measured, defined <br /> height of 32 feet. The proposed building must meet the 30-foot height limitation. <br /> Private recreational area. Each RPUD development shall provide a minimum of ten percent of <br /> the gross project area in private recreational uses for project residents. Such area shall be for <br /> active or passive recreational uses suited to the needs of the residents of the project, including <br /> swimming pools, trails, nature areas, picnic areas, tot lots and saunas. Private recreational area <br /> requirements are in addition to the standard park dedication requirements. <br /> • • The site offers a great deal of open space or natura/ area. There are 3.8 acres of <br />