06-21-2010 Planning Commission Packet

Home Browse Search

• 3 FILE 10-3469 14 June 2010 • ° Page 2 of 3 was overlooked. The proposed building location is adjacent to the location approved with , the original 2001 CUP which is next to the building's loading dock. The alternative location puts the trash enclosure at the northwest corner of the parking lot, .closer to the neighbor - _ who voiced concerns about noise and activity with the new deck as well as much farther from the loading dock. ,�;:..�, � � ' In May of 2010, the applicant requested that the Council review and include this as an ' amendment to their November approval. As it is technically a new variance it had to follow the proper process beginning with a public hearing before the Planning Commission. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET Lot Area/Width: Re uired Actual Lot Area 20,000 s uare feet 55,752 s uare feet Lot Width 100 feet 252 feet . Setbacks for the trash enclosure: � Required Existing proposed—Trash Enclosure B-4 Buildin Front—Shad ood Road 35' 130' T 85' 35' 48' building NA Rear � 30' deck , Northerl Side - 15' 109' � NA Southerl Side 15' 15.9' 7' Structural Coveraqe: . � Allowed Existin Pro osed � 8,363 s.f. 15% 5,096 s.f. 9.14% 6,680 s.f. 11.98% Hardcover• � The trash enclosure building is proposed to be constructed over existing driveway hardcover and does not create any additional new hardcover. Hardcover Area in Zone Allowed Existing Proposed Zone � Hardcover Hardcover* hardcover 500-1,000 34,242 s.f. 11,984 s.f 15,747 s.f. 15,153 s.f. 35% 45.9% 44.25% --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hardship Analysis � ln considering applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval . for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code.