Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> FILE#10-3463 �' <br /> 11 May 2010 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> � LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET <br /> Lot ArealVllidth: <br /> LR-1B Lot Area Lot Width <br /> Re uired 43,560 s.f. 1.0 acre 140' <br /> Actual 22,012 s.f. (0.50 acre) 141' <br /> Setbacks: <br /> LR-16 Re uired Pro osed <br /> Front 35' • 40' <br /> Rear 30' 69' <br /> West Side Street 35' 39.4' <br /> East Side 10' 18' <br /> Structural Covera e: <br /> Total Lot Area Total Structural Covera e <br /> 22,012 s.f. (0.50 acre) Allowed: 3,301 s.f. (15%) <br /> Pro osed: 3,299 s.f. 14.9% <br /> Hardcover Calculations: <br /> Hardcover Total Area in Allowed Existing proposed Hardcover <br /> Zone Zone Hardcover Hardcover <br /> 250'—500' 22,012 s.f. 6,603 s.f. 0 s.f.* 4,549 s.f. <br /> (30%) (0%) (20.6%) <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> Lot Area Variance <br /> The proposed home will more than meet the required property setbacks on all sides and <br /> the deficiency in lot area has not negatively impacted the site drainage with the size of <br /> home and grading plan as proposed. <br /> Hardship Statement <br /> Applicant has completed the Hardship Documentation Form attached as Exhibit B, and <br /> should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br /> Hardship Analysis <br /> In considering applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider <br /> the effect of the proposed variance upon fhe health, safety and welfare of the <br /> community, existing and anticipated tra�c conditions, light and air, danger of fire, <br /> risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding <br /> area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for <br /> variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their <br /> stricf enforcement would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique <br /> to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval <br /> only when it is demonstrated that sucFi actions will be in keeping with the spirit <br /> and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. <br /> Staff finds that the proposal is reasonably sized, fits into the immediate neighborhood, <br /> appears to meet the height requirement and also appears it can be designed so that it <br /> does not adversely affect the drainage. It should be noted that the building plans reflect <br />