Laserfiche WebLink
Low or medium density 50 0.5 � <br /> residential(up to and <br /> including 6.0 units per <br /> acre) <br /> High density residential 50 1.0 <br /> (in excess of 6.0 units <br /> per acre) <br /> *FAR=Total Building Floor Area/Total Lot Area <br /> • Individual lots within a development in the RPUD district may exceed these standards as long as the <br /> average meets these standards. <br /> (7) Developmentstandards forattached and multifamily dwelling structures. Each site rezoned to RPUD and <br /> developed for attached or multiple-family dwelling uses shall be subject to the following standards: <br /> a. Setbacks and separation of uses.Within the RPUD district the setback for all attached and <br /> multifamily dwelling buildings and their accessory buildings from any bordering or abutting <br /> street line shall be 35 feet for local streets and 50 feet from railroad lines or collector or arterial <br /> streets,as designated in the comprehensive plan,except that in no case shall the setback be <br /> less than the height of the building.The setback for all buildings from exterior RPUD site lot <br /> lines not abutting a public street shall be 35 feet,except that in no case shall the setback be less <br /> than the height of the building.Building setbacks from internal public streets shall be <br /> determined by the city based on characteristics of the specific RPUD site. Parking lots and <br /> driving lanes shall be set back at least 20 feet from all exterior lot lines of a RPUD site.The <br /> setback for parking structures,including decks and ramps,shall be 35 feet from local streets and <br /> 50 feet from all other street classifications,except that in no case shall the setback be less than <br /> the height of the structure.Parking structure setbacks from external lot lines shall be 50 feet or <br /> the height of the structure,whichever is greater,when adjacent to residential properties;35 <br /> feet,when adjacent to nonresidential properties. Parking structure setbacks from internal <br /> public or private streets shall be determined by the city based on characteristics of the specific <br /> RPUD site.Where industrial uses abut developed or platted single-family lots outside the RPUD <br /> site,greater exterior building and parking setbacks may be required in order to provide effective <br /> screening.The city council shall make a determination regarding the adequacy of screening <br /> proposed by the applicant.Screening may include the use of natural topography or earth <br /> berming,existing and proposed plantings and other features,such as roadways and wetlands, <br /> which provide separation of uses. Property rezoned to RPUD shall be considered a residential <br /> district for purposes of determining building and parking setback requirements on adjacent high <br /> density residential,commercial and industrial property outside the RPUD. <br /> b. Height limitations. For properties guided for residential use in the comprehensive plan,a <br /> building height limit of 30 feet shall apply. For properties currently zoned or guided in the <br /> comprehensive plan for commercial use, height may exceed 30 feet but shall not exceed three <br /> stories(not including underground parking level)and shall maintain a residential character by <br /> incorporating pitched or hipped roof structure.No mansard or flat roofed multiple-family <br /> building will be allowed. <br /> c. Outside storage limitations. Building materials,recreational vehicles, boats, RV's,snowmobiles, <br /> and other items of personal property shall not be stored outside within any site used for <br /> attached or multifamily uses. <br /> (8) Developmentstandards forsingle family detached dwellings in the RPUD district. <br /> (NOT APPLICABLE,REMOVED) <br /> (9) More than one building allowed. More than one building may be placed on one platted or recorded lot in <br /> a RPUD site. <br /> (10) Single housing type permitted.Any RPUD development which involves a single housing type shall be <br /> permitted,provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this division and the <br /> comprehensive plan. <br />