My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-19-2010 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2010
>
04-19-2010 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2012 3:40:58 PM
Creation date
8/14/2012 3:40:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
133
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� <br /> EXHIBIT D-2 <br /> Analysis of Individual Property Change Request <br /> 4. Site Location: 2940 Sixth Avenue North <br /> Property Owner: Susan Seeland/ Stonegate Farm, Inc. . <br /> Request: Add property to MUSA, provide municipal sewer to the property, re-guide <br /> for urban density housing. <br /> Analysis <br /> This 23-acre property on the north side of County Road 6 is currently guided for rural residential <br /> development and is not proposed to be re-guided, nor is it being incorporated into the MIJSA. <br /> The properties that are being reguided for higher density in northern Orono are limited to <br /> specific sites that abut new Highway 12. The only change in the Comprehensive Plan Update <br /> between the 2020 Plan and the 2030 Update that affects this property directly is the expansion of <br /> the designated Water Service Area to include this property. Municipal water service was <br /> committed as part of a preliminary plat approval granted in January 2008, which has since <br /> expired. <br /> Discussions regarding whether this property should be allowed to develop at urban densities with <br /> urban services took place in the context of the proposed subdivision a few years ago. The <br /> conclusion at that time was that while City water would be provided, expansion of the MUSA to <br /> allow for a sewered urban-density development at this site surrounded by rural uses would not be <br /> appropriate. Further, extension of the MUSA to allow development of this non-Shoreland <br /> property with sewer at rural densities would be in conflict with Met Council guidelines for <br /> sewered development which require such development to accomplish a net density of at least 3.0 <br /> units per acre. <br /> Sewage Treatment On-site Is Feasible At the public hearing on April 7 the property owner <br /> indicated the City had denied the use of a"current technology" on-site sewage treatment system <br /> which forced her to scrap the project. In fact, the City granted preliminary approval based on the <br /> use of a cluster septic system in which each residence would have its own collection tank, <br /> followed by a common sand filter and drainfield. The system component that the City <br /> disallowed was a proprietary filter system requiring extensive ongoing maintenance and which <br /> has a relatively poor record of being maintained in its history of various installations throughout <br /> Orono in recent years. <br /> Why This Property Should Not Be Urban The fact that sewer lines exist across County Road <br /> 6 has no bearing on sewer"availability" to this property; the proximity to sewer has not been the <br /> sole driving factor in determining where to expand Orono's urban area. In reviewing this <br /> specific site, it has vacant farmland to the north guided in the Medina Comprehensive Plan for <br /> Permanent Rural use. Property to the east in Orono is guided and zoned for 2-acre single family <br /> Rural Residential Use. Property to the west across Homestead Trail is developed for rural <br /> residential use but is guided for future acquisition by Three Rivers Park District as an addition to <br /> Morris T. Baker Regional Park. Property to the south and west across CR6 is guided, zoned and <br /> developed with 2-acre rural lots. To the southeast is the Orono Ice Arena (guided Institutional <br /> and zoned Rura1 Residential). Re-guiding the property to urban residential use would not be in <br /> keeping with its current or intended surrounding land uses. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.