Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,April 18, 2016 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Leinke stated in his view there is a fake easeinent and a real easement across the property. Lemke asked <br /> if the real easement should really be labeled as an easement. <br /> Gaffron indicated the real easement is depicted in yellow and is 10 feet on either side of the pipes. The <br /> area in green is a path and is not an easement Over the years there has been a good relationship between <br /> the current owner and the City to maintain that sewer. If the sewer cannot be maintained, it likely will <br /> stop working and cause issues. <br /> Schoenzeit stated it would be better for the new owners to have that access formalized so they understand <br /> it is there. <br /> Leskinen noted it clear that the topography dictates that access route. <br /> Gaffron stated the City does not have the option to come in from the other side since it is fairly steep and <br /> that that path has been route that has been used through the years. <br /> Landgraver asked if the path could be extended to the red line. <br /> Gaffron stated he does not believe that Public Works could negotiate that path since it is very steep in a <br /> couple of areas. There is a potentia] that the driveway to Lot 2 could be utilized. <br /> Lemke asked if there is a reason why a formal easement was never obtained for the path. <br /> Gaffron indicated he is not aware of the reasons for not obtaining that but at some point an exact route <br /> needs to fonnalized,which could iinpact the building pads. <br /> Lemke asked how far back the house pad will need to be on Lot 1. <br /> Gaffron stated if the 960' contour is the actual bluff line, it would be back almost to the 955' or 956' <br /> elevation. The house would still meet the setbacks but would be located a little further froin the lake. <br /> Thiesse coinmented he does not envision the lot lines for Lot 1 being a major issue. Thiesse asked if the <br /> cul-de-sac was drawn by the applicant. <br /> Gaffron indicated the origina] sketch was drawn by the applicant and that he drew out some possible <br /> options to see what the impacts would be on the house. <br /> Thiesse asked if the shortening of the cul-de-sac would impact the frontage. <br /> Gaffron indicated it would not since it would be ineasured froin the shoreline and at the 75-foot setback. <br /> Gaffron stated it would not be measured at the cul-de-sac for lakeshore lots. <br /> Thiesse noted if the cul-de-sac is shortened and the road is a publicly owned street,it would reduce the <br /> City's exposure. <br /> Lemke asked if the average lakeshore setback is based on the setback of the existing house from Lot 3. <br /> Page 6 of 32 <br />