My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-16-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
05-16-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 11:34:50 AM
Creation date
8/25/2016 11:34:04 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,April 18, 2016 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> As it relates to how deep the stormwater ponds should be or what happens if they dig down and find some <br /> debris,Landgraver stated during this process there should be some review of those issues. <br /> Gaffron stated the Watershed District as well as the Ciry Engineer will review all that. Gaffron stated in <br /> tenns of how that relates to the underlying debris, there will need to be some type of review. <br /> Schoenzeit stated a pond that is designed to percolate should not be allowed to become a leach field and <br /> that there needs to be some maintenance of that pond. <br /> Campion stated due to the soils on the site,infiltration will not occur and that it is designed as a filtration <br /> pond. <br /> Landgraver moved,Thiesse seconded,Application No. 16-3822,Curt Fretham of Lakewest,LLC, <br /> 3245 Wayzata Boulevard West,to recommend approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment as <br /> outlined in Staff's report with the caveat that the City should identify alternate sites for higher <br /> density development. VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 1, Schoenzeit Opposed. <br /> Lemke moved,Thiesse seconded,Application No. 16-3822,Curt Fretham of Lakewest,LLC,3245 <br /> Wayzata Boulevard West to recommend approval of rezoning the entire site from RR-1B to RPUD. <br /> VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> Leskinen stated the final piece is the preliminary plat. Leskinen asked whether a detennination should be <br /> made now on whether the road should be public or private. <br /> Gaffron indicated the City Council will need to make that final detennination but that a recommendation <br /> from the Planning Commission would be helpful. <br /> Schoenzeit recommended the road be constructed to public road standards so it can be adopted at some <br /> point down the line if necessary. <br /> Thiesse coinmented he is not sure it can be constructed to those standards. <br /> Schoenzeit stated it can be built to public standards on the western side. <br /> Campion indicated those homes can be moved further west. Campion stated the setbacks would become <br /> an issue if the road is built to 32 feet with a full right-of-way. <br /> Thiesse commented he would hope the City would be flexible on the setbacks if they require the wider <br /> width. <br /> Gaffron stated if the County is okay with a second access, the Planning Commission is suggesting that <br /> that portion of the road be made wider. Gaffron stated if the corridor is made wider,that would push the <br /> hoines to the west. <br /> Leinke stated if there is no secondary access,the layout would change quite a bit. <br /> Campion stated they could probably do some sort of T-turnaround if there is not a second access, which <br /> would ineet the typical einergency vehicle turnarounds. <br /> Page 24 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.