My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-16-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
05-16-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 11:34:50 AM
Creation date
8/25/2016 11:34:04 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,April 18, 2016 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Planning Coimnission would like them to consider additional parameters far that landfill site,they are <br /> willing to consider that. <br /> Wickstrom stated generally the reason for the 250' RPUD setback from Lake Classen is less aesthetics <br /> and more the stormwater impact on the wetlands. All of the runoff will be directed to the south into the <br /> stormwater pond and there should be no impacts to the wetlands. Wickstrom indicated they can work <br /> with Staff on the configuration if the Planning Commission would like the configuration revised. <br /> Wickstrom stated he understands the park fee will be detennined at a future time. If the City finds that <br /> any of the extra land is desired for a park,they would be willing to entertain that. Wickstroin stated in his <br /> view a land donation would be a win/win for everyone. <br /> Wickstroin noted Mr. Gaffron mentioned rezoning the entire site to RPUD would not be done at this time. <br /> Wickstrom asked if the specific development parameters would be a different process for Phase 2. <br /> Gaffron stated it would likely still be an RPUD but that the City would want to look at a separate review <br /> process and separate parameters for how Phase 2 is developed. Gaffron stated the City could include the <br /> landfill site as an RPUD at this time and only have the standards apply to Phase 1. <br /> Wickstrom stated they have attempted to limit any nnpacts to the wetlands as well as the other sensitive <br /> conservation areas. <br /> Curt Fretham, Lakewest, LLC, stated as it relates to the lot layout,it is a little unique but it has to do with <br /> widening out the building pad and providing a wider view point. The layouts range in size from 2,400 <br /> square feet up to 2,700 square feet on soine of the larger lots. The footprint for the one story ranges from <br /> 1,500 to 1,800 square feet. Frethain noted some of the hoines will probably be walkouts. <br /> Frethain noted the packet contains sorne of the different layouts they have submitted and that they have <br /> attempted to come up with some design criteria that is appealing with a variety of architectural features. <br /> Landgraver asked if there is an easy way to know where the different house styles will be located. <br /> Fretham stated the one-story hoines will tend to be on the south side of the road and that the homes on the <br /> north side will have a full basement with two stories. <br /> Schoenzeit asked what the price range will be. <br /> Fretham stated they believe the homes will be around $600,000. <br /> Schoenzeit asked what type of materials will be used on the exterior. <br /> Fretham indicated it will be Hardy,brick and stone. <br /> Leinke asked if there will be curb and gutter. <br /> Fretham stated there will be. <br /> Gaffron asked whether any fencing is being considered and/ar covenants regulating the fencing. <br /> Page 15 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.