Laserfiche WebLink
' PC EXHIBIT B <br /> FEEDBACK#1: <br /> Responses in <br /> 2 Options: <br /> 1. Remove the number of stories limitation. Ok. <br /> ;�,--:jr, t� ��; .,trur.iur�l fc,ot{�,,�nt rn�:��,����_�ri� �ic�c� under 2.Oacres). <br /> r.C-L��s ilt���r11 III11:1csi�Ufi c7� I'- dI .3.`1 . <br /> a. C_i�ange hcnv he�ght is mc�asured�� Suggestion: easier to use: average grade = <br /> highest to lowest grade: max height to average of primary roafs from main <br /> fascia to main ridge, excluding dormers set on main roof. No—there are <br /> enough other controls for height& massing with structurai coverage and <br /> harcicover combin�i. Has no effect on massing. <br /> 2. Remove the number of storles limitation. <br /> F��-j� ������iht I�milation f�.. ,�. ��t :>iJ <br /> kk:r��s�vr i5�la 5tructur�i! tcx�t�r4�it r�'���xir.�ta�7�. <br /> E�Sahl�sh a f locy� Aren R�iia lmnt rcx pr�i�cipal structures. <br /> a. �'Vhat �s �nclude�i �n �AF�� If FAR happens, consider to loosen structural footprint <br /> limitation to 20% - 25%, depending upon lot size, or, no footprint <br /> limitation. Let hardcover help control that. <br /> � ����n�e��ts�' No. <br /> ii Aktic=,, o� ar�� under �, rr�of� No. <br /> 3. Non-conforming small lots: there should be aubo variances for srnall lots in iarge lot <br /> zoning, e.g., if a lot is 60%af a canforming required lot size, require 60�/0 of required <br /> setbacks and strut�ural coverage. Qg�change zoning class in areas where most�1 <br /> lots are too sma11 to meet requirements,and always require varianaes to be put to a <br /> reasonable use. <br /> FEEDBACK #2: <br /> I think option 1 makes the most sense. It's straight fo�nrard and easy to follow. With the height <br /> requirement just come up with something from average proposed grade to midpoint of tallest roofline <br /> to be X. You could also put in a max height limit of say 45'from{owest proposed grade to ridge.Then <br /> iYs pretty straight forward. <br /> The reason I don't like option 2 is the FAR calc. Unless there's a way to get rid of any loop holes <br /> and come up with 1 way to calcu{ate it I think it gets very co�fusing. The reason I say confusing is not <br /> because iYs hard to figure but that iYs got too many gray areas. Do you could just the floor? Not the <br /> stairs? Now where the walls are? How much of the basement if it's below grade7 We've had to do it in <br /> another city and it just left too much up for interpretation. <br /> FEEDBACK#3: �� � <br /> � <br /> Remove the number of stories limitafion. <br /> Keep helght limit�tion as-is at 30'. <br /> Remove 159'o strudural footprint maximum. <br /> Estab[ish a Floor Area Ratio limit far princlpaf structures. <br /> a. What is included tn FAR? <br /> i. Basement�? YES <br /> ii. Attics, or area ur►der a roof? NO <br />