My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-16-2010 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2010
>
02-16-2010 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2012 3:30:07 PM
Creation date
8/14/2012 3:29:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
(2) Includes a program for the removal of invasive species and diseased trees; protects significant tree � <br /> stands and woodlands that support scenic and/or ecological goals; and includes mitigation of any such stands that <br /> will be impacted by development activities; <br /> (3) Protects existing wetlands by implementing new buffers or augmenting existing buffers; mitigates <br /> identified wetland impacts; and enhances degraded wetland systems; <br /> (4) Results in no negative impact to ecological communities of Ecological Management Categories 1 <br /> and 2; results in no negative modification of any ecological communities as described by the Minnesota Land Cover <br /> Classification System; and establishes, maintains and improves native ecological communities including natural and <br /> semi-natural areas to provide wildlife habitat and support natural ecological functions (i.e. drainage, filtering, <br /> buffering, etc.); <br /> (5) Establishes or maintains ecological connections through site design, as shown on the Orono Natural <br /> � Resource Inventory that will enhance stormwater collection and conveyance, promote ecological and wildlife <br /> corridors, and provide recreational opportunities for residents; <br /> (6) Preserves and where appropriate augments or improves roadway corridor enclosure to promote <br /> community aesthetics associated with the city's rural character; preserves open rural views and other aesthetic <br /> elements of the landscape; and mitigates th�e negative visual impacts of development; <br /> (7) Preserves, maintains, or reinterprets existing landmarks and unique points of local character, and <br /> preserves distinct cultural features that will maintain a familiar sense of place in the community. <br /> DIVISION 3. <br /> DENSITY BONUS STANDARDS <br /> Sec. 78-1636. Density bonuses for urban density development. <br /> For residential development in Orono's defined urban area (zoning districts allowing densities in excess of one unit <br /> per two acres, and including properties identified in the Orono Community Management Plan for conversion to <br /> urban density) within the ranges of the guided density a density bonus may be allowed if the city council finds that <br /> the performance bonus requirements of this division have been met. The city council shall determine the extent of <br /> density bonus awarded for such properties. Example: Properties guided in the Community Management Plan for a <br /> density range of two--four units per acre have a base density of two units per acre; while the high end of the density <br /> range is not guaranteed, the city council at its discretion may allow development at a final density of up to four units <br /> per acre through the performance bonus process. <br /> Sec. 78-1637. Pertormance bonus requirements. <br /> Within the urban density area, developers have the opportunity to increase the base density by going above and <br /> beyond the Basic Conservation Design Master Plan requirement. By implementing a combination of development <br /> enhancements that not only preserve but improve the natural characteristics of the property or preserve and <br /> enhance existing landmarks, the developer shall become eligible for a density bonus. The extent of such density <br /> bonus shall be determined by the city council. Development enhancements include but are not necessarily limited to <br /> the following: <br /> (1) Reforestation beyond existing woodland limits; <br /> (2) Water quality improvements; <br /> (3) Improvements in ecological grade of existing communities; <br /> (4) Upgrading of edge buffering to maximum, or tunneled, character; and <br /> (5) Major preservation or enhancement of existing landmarks. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.