Laserfiche WebLink
� <br /> #09-3436 Y <br /> February 16,2010 <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br /> LOT ANALYSIS WORSHEET------------------------------------------- <br /> Lot Area/Width• . <br /> Re uired Actual <br /> Lot Area 0.5 acre 0.34 acre <br /> Lot Width 100 feet 100 feet <br /> Setbacks: <br /> Re uired E�stin Pro osed <br /> Front 30 feet 19.1 feet 19.1 feet <br /> Rear 30 feet 90.3 feet no chan e <br /> Side 10 feet 53.3 feet 41.3 feet <br /> Alley Side 15 feet 2.6 feet no chan e <br /> Structural Covera�e: <br /> Allowed Existin * Pro osed* <br /> 2,247s.f. 15% 1,847 s.f. 12.33% 2,091s.£ 13.96% <br /> *includes patio,which is not structural coverage <br /> Hardcover: <br /> Hardcover Area in Zone Allowed Existing Proposed <br /> Zone Hardcover Hardcover* hardcover <br /> 250- 500 14,976 s.f. 4,493 s.f. 2,572 s.£ ` 2,861% s.f. <br /> 30% 17.2% 19.1% <br /> *Not including any plastic or fabric under landscaping. <br /> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> Setback Variance <br /> The proposed garage stall would have a front setback of 19.1 feet from the right of way of <br /> Ethel Avenue. A 30 foot setback is required. This is the same setback as the house and the <br /> existing gazage sta11. There is approximately 36 feet between the garage door and the edge of <br /> the pavement of Ethel Avenue. <br /> Hardship Statement <br /> Applicant has completed the Hardship Documentation Form attached as E�ibit B, and <br /> should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br /> Hardship Analysis <br /> In co�:sidering applications for variance, the Planni�zg Commission s/tall consider tlte effect of t/:e proposed <br /> variance upon t/ee/zealt/z, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, <br /> Iiglit and air, danger of fire, risk to tl:e public safety,and tlee effect on values of property in tl:e surrounding <br /> area. TI:e P[anning Commission shall consider recomme�:ding approval for varimices from t/ie literal <br /> provisions of tl:e Zoning Code in instances w/:ere t/ieir strict enforcement would cause undue I:ardsliip <br /> because of circumstances unique to tl:e individual property under consideration, ai:d s1:a11 recommend <br /> approval only w/zen it is demonstrated tl:at suc1: actions will be in keeping witl: t/ie spirit and intent of t/:e <br /> Orono Zo�zing Code. <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> Are there any issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Planning Staff recommends approval. <br />