My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-21-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
03-21-2016 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:27 PM
Creation date
8/25/2016 10:35:31 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
190
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE#18-3814 ` <br /> March 15,2016 <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br /> 7. The granting of the proposed variances will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort <br /> or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting of <br /> the average setback variances would not impair health, safety, comfort or morals and <br /> would be in keeping with the intent of the zoning code. Granting of a hardcover <br /> variance may be justified by resulting in a reduction of hardcover from existing levels <br /> and in order to provide for off-street parking. <br /> 8. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but <br /> is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. In the opinion of staff,granting of the <br /> average setback variance is necessary to solve a practical difficulty. Granting the <br /> hardcover variance might be construed as merely a convenience to the applicant,since <br /> a new home could be developed on the site without a variance, but the variance <br /> would assist in providing for off-street parking where on-street parking is lacking. <br /> The Commission may recommend and the Council may impose conditions in granting of <br /> variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough <br /> proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed <br /> beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. <br /> Analysis-Average Lakeshore Setback Variance <br /> Because the adjacent property to the south is vacant, the required Average Lakeshore Setback is <br /> defined by the setback from the lake of the adjacent home to the north, which is 115' from the <br /> lake. That neighboring property as well as most of the properties along the east side of Bohn's <br /> Point are much deeper than applicants' property, and as a result the neighboring homes are set <br /> back at least 100 feet or more from the lake. Absent a variance to the 115' setback, the <br /> applicant's property will have a buildable envelope of 25'-40' in depth and 120' in width, <br /> potentially resulting in a long narrow home stretching from side lot line to side lot line, likely not <br /> in character with the neighborhood. <br /> A critical factor in whether an average setback variance is appropriate is whether granting the <br /> variance will negatively impact existing views of the lake enjoyed by neighboring property <br /> owners. It appears that a majority of lake views for the adjoining home are directly toward the <br /> lake, not across applicants' property, and existing evergreen screening between the two homes <br /> provides a visual barrier. Further, the northerly portion of the new proposed residence will be <br /> set back from the lake approximately 10 feet further than the existing house, so that any <br /> neighbor views that do exist will be opened up further. <br /> Analysis-Hardcover Variance <br /> Per the highlighted site plan (Exhibit C) and the proposed hardcover calculation worksheet <br /> (Exhibit F) proposed hardcover on the property consists primarily of the house and driveway, <br /> with sidewalks, steps and patios accounting for the remainder. This is one of the smallest lots on <br /> Bohn's Point. The proposed house footprint is right at the 15% structural coverage limit. <br /> Proposed hardcover is approximately 600 square feet over the 25% limit. This amount is <br /> approximately equal to the area of the portion of driveway north of the garage apron, which <br /> provides for the loop access and entry sidewalk. Compared to the existing residence and <br /> driveway, the footprint of the proposed home is about 400 s.f. larger and the proposed driveway <br /> is about 400 s.f. smaller. The proposed hardcover decrease is accounted for in ancillary <br /> hardcover such as decks, sidewalks and stairways. While a reduction from the existing 29.0% to <br /> 27.2% is positive, Planning Commission should consider whether additional reductions are <br /> appropriate. If the lack of nearby on-street parking and the relatively small (compared to the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.