Laserfiche WebLink
, , ; , � <br /> Itenr#11-CC Agenda-12/ll/06 <br /> File#06-3234/35[Total Pages 94J <br /> Kempf concun•ed that the Ciiy Engineer s(iould review the plans prior to the City Council reviewing it. <br /> Hessburg stated he is agreeable to working with the Ciiy Engineer: <br /> Bremer stated the problem the Planning Commission has with the applicatioi� is that there are a uumber of issues <br /> that have not been finalized,such as the drainage and the hardcover,and that these issues should be resolved prior <br /> � to the application proceeding forward to tlle Council. <br /> Hessberg requested the Planning Commission provide soine guidance on the l�ardcover for the larger lot. <br /> Hessburg noted his purchase agreement is contingent on the City Council approving his proposal for the two lots. <br /> Hessburg stated the problem with the two-story is whether he can gefi 50 percent of the foundation below grade. <br /> Cu��tis statecl she has not conducted an analysis to determine whether the revised plans would comply with the <br /> City's proposed zoning code amendment on definitions of basement and story. <br /> Rahn stated he would feel more conlfortable approviug the applicatiou ifthe City Engii�eer has made some <br /> recommendations on these plans. <br /> Hessburg inquired if the Planning Commission could provide him with a number that the I�ardcover should be <br /> reduced to. <br /> Sansevere stated in his view tl�e Planning Commission I�as given the applicant good guidance on how his plans <br /> should be revised and that it is di�cult for flie Platming Commission to give someone a definite number on the <br /> hardcover tliat wou]d be allowed on a lot. <br /> Bremer suggested the applicant table l�is application to continue to work with staff on his proposaL <br /> Bremer opened the public hearing at 7:05 p.m, <br /> Andrew Rasclier,4705 North Shore Drive,uiquired wliat the issae is with the driveway. Rascl�er noted there is <br /> another property witl� a steep driveway and he is not aware of any issues with that driveway. <br /> � <br /> Rahn stated one issue with the driveway is the inability for a large car to park in the driveway without encroaching <br /> onto the neighboring property and that the second issue deals with the desire ofthe Platu�ing Commission to obtain <br /> the recoinmendations of the City Engineer prior to voting on this application. <br /> Hessburg stated the driveway could be move fuirther westward to help address those issues. <br /> Bremer closed tl�e public hearing at 7:07 p.m. <br /> Ralm stated dle fewer variauces that are requested,the inore favorably tl�e application would be looked at. <br /> Rahn moved,Bremer seconded, to table Application#06-3234 and Application#06-3235,Daniel Hessburg, <br /> 4725 North Shore Drive and 4731 North Shore Drive. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. <br /> Hessburg inquired wliethei•the Council would approve impervious pavers. <br /> Bremer stated at this time t(te City is not interested in approving the use of inrpervious pavers. <br /> � 5 <br />